ASHA: Blast From The Past

Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi

“I see nothing but happiness in martyrdom, and life with oppressors as nothing but misery.”
— Imam Husain ibn Ali

Since the commencement of Muharram this year, we have reflected upon many dimensions of the tragedy of Karbala. We have written about the companions of Imam Husain, the women and children who shared his suffering, the role of Zainab in preserving the memory of Ashura, the universal brotherhood represented in his camp, the educational role of Muharram, and the enduring influence of Karbala on literature, culture, and political thought. In truth, the message of Imam Husain is embedded in all these themes. Each aspect of Karbala is but a window through which one glimpses a larger moral vision.

Before proceeding in the coming days to examine other dimensions of Muharram and the legacy of the Ahl al-Bayt, it is useful to pause and ask a fundamental question: What was the message and mission of Husain himself? Why does his name continue to move hearts and inspire consciences more than thirteen centuries after his martyrdom? Why is it that a small band of men, women, and children who perished on a remote desert plain continue to command the admiration of millions across the world?

The answer lies in the fact that Karbala was never merely a historical event. It was a moral revolution. It was a declaration that truth must be upheld even when defeat appears certain, that conscience must never be surrendered to power, and that human dignity is worth more than life itself. The struggle of Imam Husain was not for a throne, a kingdom, or worldly authority. It was a struggle to preserve the ethical and spiritual foundations of Islam and, in doing so, to provide a timeless example for all humanity.

To understand Husain’s mission, one must appreciate the circumstances in which he lived. He was the beloved grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, the son of Imam Ali and Fatima al-Zahra, and a member of the Prophet’s household, whose virtues were repeatedly extolled by the Prophet himself. Husain grew up witnessing Islam not merely as a system of rituals but as a moral order founded upon justice, compassion, accountability, and service to humanity.

When Mu’awiya died in 680 CE and his son Yazid assumed power, Husain was confronted with a momentous choice. Yazid demanded allegiance from the leading figures of the Muslim community. To many, this may have appeared a routine political matter. To Husain, however, it was a question of moral legitimacy. He believed that acquiescence would amount to endorsing a system that had reduced the caliphate from a moral trust into hereditary kingship. To remain silent would be to betray the values for which his grandfather and father had struggled. Husain therefore refused to submit. Yet his refusal was not motivated by political ambition. Had power been his objective, he could have reached an accommodation with the ruling regime and enjoyed wealth, comfort, and influence. Instead, he consciously chose a path that he knew would lead to suffering and death.

His own words explain his purpose: “I did not rise out of arrogance, pride, corruption, or oppression. I rose only to seek reform in the community of my grandfather. I desire to enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong.”

These words constitute the manifesto of Karbala. Husain did not rise to conquer territory. He rose to restore moral consciousness. He understood that religion without justice becomes hollow, and that faith divorced from ethical responsibility loses its meaning. His mission was therefore one of reform, accountability, and the awakening of conscience. This emphasis on conscience is perhaps the most enduring aspect of Husain’s message. Karbala teaches that every individual possesses the freedom and responsibility to distinguish right from wrong. Throughout the tragedy, the central issue was not tribal affiliation, political loyalty, or military strength. The real question was whether one would stand with truth or with power.

The companions of Husain embody this principle. Many of them were not related to him by blood. Some came from tribes that had no historical association with the Prophet’s family. Others had once been sympathetic to opposing political camps. Yet when confronted with the choice between justice and expediency, they chose justice. Among them was Zuhair ibn Qayn, who had initially avoided meeting Husain but ultimately became one of his most devoted supporters. There was Jawn (John), the elderly freed African companion who insisted on fighting alongside Husain despite being released from any obligation to do so. There were former slaves, tribal chiefs, young men in the prime of life, and elderly companions approaching the end of their days. Karbala brought together people of different backgrounds and social positions in a common commitment to truth.

This diversity reveals an important dimension of Husain’s mission. Karbala was not an Arab struggle, nor a family dispute within Quraysh. It was a universal movement. In the camp of Husain stood Arabs and non-Arabs, free men and former slaves, nobles and commoners. The movement represented humanity in miniature. Its message was addressed not to one tribe or one community but to all people. Equally significant was the role of the youth. Ali Akbar, Qasim ibn Hasan, Aun and Muhammad, and many other young participants demonstrated extraordinary courage. They remind us that moral greatness is not determined by age. Karbala teaches that the young are capable of profound ethical insight and immense sacrifice when guided by noble ideals.

The presence of children deepens this lesson. Sakina, Ruqayya, and the infant Ali Asghar stand among the most poignant figures of Karbala. Their suffering transformed the tragedy from a political conflict into a universal human drama. The image of an infant struck by an arrow while seeking water has moved generations because it exposes the cruelty of oppression in its starkest form. Yet the message of Husain is not confined to those who stood with him. Karbala also compels us to reflect upon those who failed him. Many people in Kufa knew that Husain represented justice. They had invited him to come. They had pledged their support. Yet when confronted with threats and intimidation, most abandoned him. This is one of the most uncomfortable but important lessons of Karbala. Tyranny survives not only because of tyrants but because ordinary people choose silence. The tragedy teaches that neutrality in moments of moral crisis is itself a choice. The people of Kufa did not kill Husain with their swords alone. Many helped create the conditions for his martyrdom through fear, hesitation, and inaction. Karbala therefore speaks not only about the crimes of oppressors but also about the responsibilities of bystanders. Every generation must ask itself whether it resembles the small group that stood with Husain or the much larger crowd that remained silent.

The mission of Husain cannot be understood without acknowledging the extraordinary role of the women of Karbala. If Husain gave the movement its blood, Zainab gave it its voice. Following the massacre, it was Zainab who assumed leadership of the survivors. She comforted the bereaved, protected the children, and confronted the victorious authorities. Her speeches in Kufa and Damascus rank among the most powerful acts of resistance in history. Standing as a captive before the rulers responsible for her family’s suffering, she refused to be intimidated. Instead, she transformed captivity into a platform for truth. The survival of Karbala’s message owes as much to Zainab as to those who fell on the battlefield. Without her courage and eloquence, the tragedy might have been reduced to a forgotten military episode. Through her words and actions, it became an enduring moral narrative. The role of the women and children also reminds us that Karbala was not solely a battlefield encounter. It was a struggle involving entire families. The sacrifices of Sakina, Rubab, Umm Kulthum, Fizza, and countless others demonstrate that resistance to oppression is not confined to warriors. The moral courage shown by the women of Karbala was no less significant than the physical courage displayed by its martyrs.

At its deepest level, Husain’s mission was a defence of human dignity. His famous refusal to accept humiliation has inspired people far beyond the Muslim world. Mahatma Gandhi saw in Husain’s sacrifice a model for resisting injustice. Jawaharlal Nehru described him as a symbol of courage and steadfastness. Muhammad Ali Jinnah admired his moral example. The historian Thomas Carlyle regarded Karbala as proof that true victory belongs not to those who possess armies but to those who possess conviction. Such admiration arises because the message of Husain transcends religious boundaries. One need not be Muslim to appreciate the principles for which he stood. Truthfulness, justice, courage, sacrifice, and resistance to oppression are values recognised by all civilisations.

This universality explains why Karbala has inspired such a vast literary and cultural tradition. In the Persian-speaking world, it gave rise to devotional poetry, passion plays, and historical narratives. In South Asia, poets such as Anees and Dabeer transformed Karbala into one of the greatest traditions of Urdu literature. Modern writers, including progressive poets and intellectuals, continue to invoke Husain as a symbol of resistance against tyranny and injustice. Indeed, every Muharram reminds us that Karbala is not merely remembered; it is relived. The majlis, the nauha, the marsiya, the procession, the distribution of food and water, and the gathering of communities all serve to renew the values for which Husain stood. Muharram functions as a living school that educates minds, shapes consciences, and transmits ethical ideals from one generation to the next.

Ultimately, the mission of Husain was to preserve the moral essence of religion. He demonstrated that faith is not measured by outward displays of piety alone but by one’s willingness to stand for justice when doing so carries a cost. He showed that numbers do not determine truth, that power does not confer legitimacy, and that sacrifice in the cause of righteousness can prove more enduring than the victories of kings. This is why Husain remains alive in human memory while the empires that opposed him have largely faded into history. The battlefield of Karbala lasted only a few hours. Its moral impact has endured for more than thirteen centuries. For this reason, Allama Ali Naqi Naqqan aptly described him as Shahid-e-Insaniyat, the Martyr of Humanity. Husain belongs not merely to one sect, one nation, or one historical period. He belongs to every age in which people confront injustice, every society in which conscience struggles against power, and every individual who seeks to live with dignity rather than submission.

The enduring message of Husain can therefore be summarised in a simple but profound proposition: there are values more precious than life itself. Truth, justice, honour, and conscience are among them. When these values are threatened, silence becomes complicity and resistance becomes duty. That was the mission of Husain at Karbala. That remains the message of Husain today. And that is why his name continues to illuminate hearts and consciences across the world, generation after generation.

Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi

When Karbala is recalled, the popular imagination tends to fix upon the members of the Prophet’s family. The names of Husain, Abbas, Ali Akbar, Qasim, Sakina, Zainab and Ali Asghar naturally dominate the narrative. Yet to regard Karbala solely as a tragedy of the Prophet’s household is to overlook one of its most profound dimensions. Karbala was not merely a family calamity; it was a gathering of humanity in miniature. Arabs and non-Arabs, nobles and commoners, former slaves and tribal chiefs, old men and children, blacks and whites, men and women – even those who had once held differing political loyalties – stood together in defence of a single moral principle.

The battlefield of Karbala represented the ideal Islamic community as envisioned by the Prophet Muhammad. Social distinctions disappeared before the demands of conscience. The camp of Husain was defined not by race, tribe, wealth or ancestry, but by the choice to stand with truth. As Wilferd Madelung observes in The Succession to Muhammad, the confrontation at Karbala was fundamentally about the nature of legitimate authority in Islam, and those who rallied to Husain did so out of conviction rather than tribal allegiance.

This diversity becomes even more remarkable when one examines the backgrounds of those who accompanied Imam Husain. Among them were descendants of the Prophet, veterans of the early Islamic conquests, former supporters of Caliph Uthman, Persians, Turks, Africans, freed slaves, servants and even Christians. Husain M. Jafri, in The Origins and Early Development of Shi’a Islam, emphasises that the supporters of Husain represented a cross-section of early Islamic society, bound together by opposition to what they perceived as the usurpation of rightful authority. Karbala thus emerged as a universal movement whose message transcended every social and ethnic boundary.

Among the most celebrated martyrs was Jawn ibn Huwayy, the former slave of Abuzar al-Ghifari. The earliest historical sources provide only a brief mention of his presence. In al-Tabari’s Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk, which preserves the account of Abu Mikhnaf, we find the simple notation that “Huwayy” – a former slave of Abuzar – fell alongside Husain. Similarly, in Shaykh al-Mufid’s Kitab al-Irshad, the figure appears as “Juwayn”, listed among the martyrs without elaboration. By the time of the later maqtal literature, however, his story had grown considerably. Ibn Shahrashub, in Manaqib Al Abi Talib, records a poem attributed to Jawn and a famous dialogue with Imam Husain in which the Imam offers to release him from his oath of allegiance, only for Jawn to refuse. The elderly Abyssinian declared that he could not enjoy the blessings of the Ahl al-Bayt in times of peace and abandon them in times of hardship. He fought until he was martyred. In the memory of Karbala, the former slave attained a rank equal to princes and nobles.

Nor was Jawn alone. The lists of martyrs preserved in the maqtal literature mention numerous freedmen and servants. Aslam al-Turki, a Turkish freedman attached to Husain’s household, fought and died at Karbala. Qarib, a servant of Imam Husain, and Munjih, a servant associated with Imam Hasan, likewise gave their lives. Harith ibn Nabhan, the son of a servant of Hamza ibn Abd al-Muttalib, also fell among the martyrs. Their presence demonstrates that Karbala was not an aristocratic cause; it was a movement in which those occupying the lowest positions in society found themselves standing shoulder to shoulder with the descendants of the Prophet. The Maqatil al-Talibiyyin of Abu al-Faraj al-Isfahani preserves numerous such names, underscoring the social diversity of Husain’s companions.

The role of servants and slaves becomes still more striking in the narratives preserved in later maqtal and majlis traditions. These accounts may not always be recoverable from the earliest chronicles, but they reveal how Muslim memory understood the ethical significance of Karbala. As Mahmoud Ayoub demonstrates in Redemptive Suffering in Islam, the Karbala narrative evolved over time to emphasise themes of sacrificial loyalty and moral redemption, with even the humblest figures emerging as exemplars of virtue.

One such account concerns Habib ibn Mazahir, the aged companion of Imam Husain. When news of Husain’s isolation reached Kufa, Habib sought ways to evade Umayyad surveillance. According to later traditions preserved in Persian and Indo-Muslim maqtal works, it was his servant who urged him not to delay and reminded him of his duty towards the grandson of the Prophet. The social hierarchy of master and slave was momentarily reversed; the servant became the voice of conscience.

A similar episode is associated with Hurr ibn Yazid al-Riyahi. Hurr’s own transformation remains one of the most powerful moments in Islamic history. Having initially blocked Husain’s route, he ultimately abandoned worldly rank and military command to join the Imam. Later traditions relate that one of Hurr’s servants requested permission to fight alongside his master. Inspired by Hurr’s example, he too chose martyrdom over survival.

Equally moving is the account connected with Zuhair ibn Qayn. Zuhair had not always been counted among the supporters of Ali. Many traditions describe him as having sympathies with the camp known as the Shi’at Uthman – those who continued to identify strongly with the cause of Caliph Uthman. Yet when confronted with the moral challenge of Karbala, Zuhair underwent a profound transformation and became one of Husain’s most loyal defenders. As Ali Rahnema observes in his studies on Karbala memory, the narrative deliberately includes figures like Zuhair to illustrate that the appeal of Husain’s cause extended beyond partisan boundaries.

After his martyrdom, later narratives tell us, his widow sent a servant carrying a shroud to cover his body. Reaching the battlefield, the servant saw not only the body of Zuhair but also the unburied bodies of Husain, Abbas, Ali Akbar, Qasim and the other martyrs. Overcome with emotion, he returned without using the shroud. How, he reportedly asked, could he cover his master while the grandson of the Prophet remained exposed beneath the sun? Whether preserved as history or as sacred memory, the episode captures the spirit of Karbala, where personal loyalties dissolved before devotion to Husain.

The diversity of Husain’s companions extended beyond slaves and servants. Karbala also included men whose tribal, political and ethnic backgrounds differed widely. Zuhair himself demonstrates that support for Husain was not confined to those already identified with the partisans of Ali; individuals who had previously occupied different positions within the political conflicts of the early Muslim community also found themselves drawn to his cause.

Likewise, the presence of non-Arabs is significant. Men of Persian, Turkish and African origin appear throughout the lists of Karbala’s martyrs, as documented in sources such as Ibsar al-Ayn fi Ansar al-Husayn by Shaykh Muhammad Samawi, which meticulously catalogues the companions of the Imam. Their participation illustrates the cosmopolitan character of the early Islamic world. Karbala was not an Arab tribal struggle; it was a struggle over principles that resonated across ethnic boundaries.

The Christian presence in the wider Karbala tradition further reinforces this point. The stories of Christian monks, hermits and sympathisers who recognised the sanctity of Husain – whether historical or devotional – reflect a conviction deeply embedded in Muslim memory: that the truth represented by Husain could be recognised even by those outside the Muslim community. Karbala became a moral event whose significance transcended confessional boundaries.

Among the most remarkable figures connected with the women of Karbala is Fizza, the devoted servant of Fatima al-Zahra. Although often overshadowed by the towering personality of Zainab, Fizza occupies an important place in Shi’i memory. She had long served the household of Ali and Fatima and remained deeply attached to the family. While the earliest sources, such as al-Tabari and al-Mufid, focus primarily on the male martyrs and the orations of Zainab, the later maqtal and majlis traditions – particularly in Persian and Indo-Muslim devotional literature – expand considerably upon Fizza’s role.

Later traditions place her among those who endured the suffering of Karbala and the subsequent captivity. Her role did not end on the battlefield. Like Zainab, she emerged as one of the voices of resistance during the captivity of the Ahl al-Bayt. Accounts preserved in devotional literature describe her speaking boldly in the courts of Kufa and Damascus and defending the dignity of the Prophet’s family.

One particularly striking tradition recounts that while in captivity she encountered members of her own Abyssinian community. They offered assistance and protection. Yet Fizza refused to separate her fate from that of the Prophet’s household. She would not accept freedom for herself while the daughters and granddaughters of the Prophet remained prisoners. Her loyalty was not to tribe, race or ethnicity; it was to the cause of Husain and the family of Muhammad.

In this respect Fizza’s example parallels that of Zainab herself. Just as Zainab transformed captivity into a platform for resistance, Fizza transformed servitude into a form of moral leadership. Her speeches, her refusal to abandon the captives, and her steadfastness in the face of humiliation ensured that she became one of the lesser-known but deeply significant heroines of the Karbala narrative.

What emerges from all these accounts is a vision of Karbala fundamentally different from the simplistic notion of a conflict between two Arab clans. Karbala was not merely a confrontation between Banu Hashim and Banu Umayya; it was a gathering of humanity around a moral choice. Those who stood with Husain came from different races, tribes, social classes and political backgrounds. Some were descendants of the Prophet, some were former slaves, some were non-Arabs, and some had previously followed different political loyalties. Yet all were united by a shared recognition of truth.

The enduring power of Karbala lies precisely in this universality. Every section of society found representation in Husain’s camp. The noble and the humble, the free and the enslaved, the Arab and the non-Arab, the man and the woman, the elder and the child – all participated in the same struggle.

For this reason Karbala continues to inspire people across cultures and centuries. It demonstrates that dignity is not inherited through birth, wealth or status. The greatest heroes of Karbala were not necessarily those of the highest rank. Some were slaves, some were servants, some were strangers, some were women. Yet all attained greatness because they chose principle over power.

Karbala thus remains a timeless lesson that human worth is determined not by who one is, but by the choices one makes when confronted with injustice. On the plains of Karbala, the descendants of the Prophet stood beside former slaves, and together they created one of history’s most enduring testimonies to equality, loyalty and moral courage.

---

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Abu Mikhnaf (d. 774). Maqtal al-Husayn (preserved in al-Tabari).

Abu al-Faraj al-Isfahani (d. 967). Maqatil al-Talibiyyin. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah.

Al-Mufid, Shaykh (d. 1022). Kitab al-Irshad. Translated by I.K.A. Howard. London: Muhammadi Trust, 1981.

Al-Samawi, Shaykh Muhammad (d. c. 1920). Ibsar al-Ayn fi Ansar al-Husayn. Najaf: al-Matba’ah al-Haydariyyah.

Al-Tabari (d. 923). Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk. Edited by M.J. de Goeje. Leiden: Brill, 1879-1901.

Ibn Shahrashub (d. 1192). Manaqib Al Abi Talib. Qum: Intisharat-i Allamah.

Ibn Tawus, Sayyid (d. 1266). al-Luhuf ‘ala Qatla al-Tufuf. Beirut: Dar al-Mahajjah al-Bayda’.

Modern Studies

Ayoub, Mahmoud. Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of Ashura in Twelver Shi’ism. The Hague: Mouton, 1978.

Crone, Patricia. Roman, Provincial and Islamic Law: The Origins of the Islamic Patronate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Inloes, Amina. ‘Racial “Othering” in Shi’i Sacred History: Jawn ibn Huwayy the “African Slave”, and the Ethnicities of the Twelve Imams’. Journal of Shi’a Islamic Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, 2017.

Jafri, S. Husain M. The Origins and Early Development of Shi’a Islam. London: Longman, 1979.

Madelung, Wilferd. The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Rahnema, Ali. ‘Karbala and the Memory of the Martyrs’. In The Routledge Handbook of Shi’a Islam, edited by Robert Gleave. London: Routledge, forthcoming.

Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi

The tragedy of Karbala is indelibly marked by the memory of its adult protagonists: Imam Husain ibn Ali, his half-brother Abbas, his son Ali Akbar, and his sister Zainab, alongside the loyal companions who fell beside them on the plains of Karbala in 61 AH (680 CE). Yet the conflict’s profound impact extended far beyond these well-known figures, enveloping the youngest members of Husain’s household and retinue. Children were not merely passive observers; they were integral to the narrative, their experiences ranging from active, albeit tragic, participation on the battlefield to the profound suffering of hunger, thirst, bereavement, captivity, and displacement. Among them was an infant whose death would evolve into one of the most poignant and powerful symbols within Islamic commemorative traditions, particularly in Shi’i piety. Collectively, their stories illuminate how the events at Karbala affected multiple generations of the Prophet’s family, embedding a legacy of sacrifice and resilience that transcends age.

The children associated with Karbala occupy a singular and enduring place in Islamic historical memory. Their narratives, preserved and transmitted through a rich tapestry of early chronicles, biographical dictionaries, maqtal (martyrdom) literature, and later devotional poetry and rituals, are consistently interpreted as exemplars of courage, unwavering loyalty, profound faith, and steadfast perseverance. Over the centuries, these youthful experiences have been imbued with profound symbolic meaning, coming to represent the broader themes of righteous sacrifice, moral commitment in the face of overwhelming tyranny, and the forging of communal identity through shared remembrance.

Sources and the Construction of Historical Memory

Before examining the individual stories, it is essential to consider the historiographical landscape through which their memory has been mediated. Our knowledge of the children of Karbala derives from a layered corpus of sources. The foundational account is that of Abu Mikhnaf (d. 774 CE), whose Maqtal al-Husain was composed relatively soon after the events. Although the original text is no longer extant independently, substantial portions were meticulously preserved by the renowned historian al-Tabari (d. 923 CE) in his monumental Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk. Valuable corroborating information is also found in al-Baladhuri’s (d. 892 CE) Ansab al-Ashraf and in the comprehensive histories of Ibn Athir (d. 1233 CE) and other medieval scholars. Later compilations, such as al-Khwarizmi’s (d. 1172 CE) Maqtal al-Husain and Ibn Tawus’s (d. 1266 CE) al-Luhuf fi Qatla al-Tufuf, preserve a wealth of traditions concerning the younger victims and the surviving children of the Prophet’s household, often elaborating on the emotional and devotional dimensions of the tragedy.

Modern scholarship has approached these sources with a critical eye, seeking to distinguish between the earlier, more restrained historical reports and the later, often more elaborate, devotional elaborations. Scholars such as Wilferd Madelung, S. H. M. Jafri, Moojan Momen, and Kamran Scot Aghaie have carefully examined the transmission chains and the socio-political contexts in which these narratives were cultivated. While they acknowledge that certain details, particularly those of a highly miraculous or emotive nature, appear more prominently in later commemorative traditions, the consensus remains that the available evidence robustly indicates that children were indeed present at Karbala, that several were killed during or in immediate connection with the battle, and that the survivors played a crucial, albeit often understated, role in preserving and transmitting the memory of the event.

With this historical and literary background in mind, the children of Karbala can be thoughtfully considered through three interconnected thematic lenses: the young battlefield casualties, the infant and child victims of the conflict’s violence, and the surviving witnesses whose subsequent experiences shaped the enduring remembrance of the tragedy.

The Young Battlefield Martyrs

Among the most celebrated of these young participants is Qasim ibn Hasan, the son of Imam Hasan and the nephew of Imam Husain. Orphaned years before Karbala, Qasim was raised under the guardianship of his uncle, Husain, who became a paternal figure to him. According to traditional accounts, after witnessing the successive deaths of numerous companions and relatives on the fateful day of Ashura, the youthful Qasim repeatedly importuned his uncle for permission to enter the battlefield. In a widely transmitted tradition preserved in Karbala literature, Husain, moved by the boy’s earnestness, asked him how he regarded death. Qasim is said to have replied with a poignant metaphor, declaring that death in the path of truth was sweeter than honey. While historians exercise due caution regarding the precise historical reliability of such dialogue, the narrative has become a cornerstone of later representations of Qasim’s character, epitomising youthful devotion and an unflinching commitment to principle. Traditional accounts state that permission was eventually granted and that Qasim fought valiantly before being overwhelmed and martyred. His death remains one of the most frequently and poignantly commemorated episodes in Karbala narratives, often serving as a powerful representation of dedication to a just cause, irrespective of age.

Another son of Imam Hasan whose memory is indelibly etched in Karbala traditions is Abdullah ibn Hasan. Unlike Qasim, Abdullah is generally described as a young child who had remained in the camp with the women and other non-combatants. According to the sources, as the battle reached its violent crescendo and Husain stood largely isolated, wounded, and exhausted, Abdullah, upon witnessing his uncle’s peril, ran from the tents in a desperate act of familial loyalty. Traditional reports relate that when a soldier moved to strike Husain, the young Abdullah rushed forward to shield him. In these accounts, his arm was severed by a blow, and he was subsequently killed, falling beside his uncle. The episode is commonly presented as a profound example of spontaneous loyalty and familial devotion, a child’s instinctive love overcoming the terror of the battlefield, though details concerning his age and the exact circumstances of his death vary across different sources.

The youthful casualties also included Aun and Muhammad, the sons of Zainab bint Ali and Abdullah ibn Ja’far. Through their mother, they were direct descendants of Ali and Fatima and great-grandsons of the Prophet Muhammad. Their presence at Karbala vividly illustrates the extent to which members of the Prophet’s extended family were enmeshed in the events surrounding Husain’s movement. According to traditional accounts, the two brothers, after witnessing the martyrdom of their relatives and companions, requested permission to fight. These reports state that they entered the battle and were subsequently killed, defending their uncle. Their deaths have often been interpreted as reflecting the participation of multiple generations of the Banu Hashim in the conflict, and they feature prominently in discussions of Zainab’s anguished but resilient role in Karbala.

The descendants of Aqil ibn Abi Talib, Husain’s cousin, likewise suffered grievous losses. Among them was Muhammad ibn Abi Sa’id ibn Aqil, a young boy whose death is reported to have occurred amid the chaotic turmoil following Husain’s martyrdom. Historical traditions describe him emerging from the tents, perhaps in a state of confusion or seeking his family, and being mercilessly killed by opposing soldiers who showed no distinction between combatant and non-combatant. Although the details of this account vary, it is frequently cited as stark evidence of the vulnerability of the innocent and the indiscriminate nature of the violence meted out during the aftermath of the battle.

Closely associated with the tragedy are Muhammad and Ibrahim, the sons of Muslim ibn Aqil. Muslim, Husain’s cousin and his representative in Kufa, had been betrayed and executed in that city before the events at Karbala, after losing the local support that had initially invited Husain to Iraq. According to long-established traditions, his young sons, having been left behind or subsequently captured, later fell into captivity and were eventually martyred. While many of the more elaborate details of their story derive from later maqtal literature, the narrative became an influential and heart-rending symbol of innocence, persecution, and steadfastness in the face of overwhelming adversity. These accounts collectively demonstrate that the events of Karbala involved not only experienced adult combatants but also a significant number of younger individuals, whose stories became an inextricable part of the broader historical and moral record.

Infant and Child Victims of the Tragedy

Among the children associated with Karbala, Ali Asghar, also reverently known as Abdullah al-Radhi (the ‘Pleasing Infant’), occupies a uniquely prominent and emotive place in later tradition. He is universally identified as the infant son of Imam Husain and is commonly described as being approximately six months old at the time of Ashura. In the harrowing accounts, the severe thirst that afflicted those in Husain’s camp is emphasised, as access to the Euphrates had been restricted by Yazid’s forces for several days. Many narrations relate that Husain, cradling the parched infant in his arms, walked to the frontline and, exposing the baby to the opposing army, made a desperate appeal for water on the child’s behalf. According to the traditional narrative, rather than receiving succour, the innocent infant was instead struck by a three-pronged arrow, which pierced his neck, and he died in his father’s arms. The death of Ali Asghar became one of the most searing and significant episodes in the memory of Karbala. In later religious and literary traditions, it evolved into a powerful symbol of the suffering of the most innocent and vulnerable during the conflict, playing a central role in shaping the moral and emotional dimensions of Karbala commemoration and invoking profound empathy for the plight of Husain and his family. The deaths of children such as Ali Asghar and Muhammad ibn Abi Sa’id ibn Aqil powerfully underscore the extent to which the violence associated with Karbala affected both combatants and non-combatants, leaving no segment of the household untouched.

The Surviving Witnesses of Karbala

If Ali Asghar became a symbol of innocent victimhood in later tradition, Sakina bint Husain (also known as Ruqayya) came to represent endurance, survival, and the profound emotional toll of the tragedy. She was one of the young daughters of Imam Husain and was present during the events of Karbala. Traditional accounts describe her witnessing the deaths of her father and relatives and enduring the immense hardships that followed the battle, including the harrowing journey of captivity. Following the death of her father, Sakina was among those taken captive and paraded through Kufa and Damascus. Her experiences, particularly her poignant suffering and grief, occupy a prominent place in later devotional literature and ritual lamentation. One widely circulated, albeit historically debated, tradition recounts that while imprisoned in a cell in Damascus, she awoke crying for her father. According to this narrative, when Husain’s severed head was brought before her, she died of grief. Although historians have questioned the origins and precise historical reliability of this heart-rending account, it has nevertheless become an influential and indelible element of Karbala remembrance, encapsulating the tragedy of a child’s loss.

Alongside Sakina were other young girls of the Prophet’s household, including Fatima bint Husain and the many daughters of Husain’s brothers and cousins. Their individual stories receive less attention in many of the historical chronicles than those of the battlefield casualties; yet they remain critically important for understanding the full scope of the aftermath of Karbala. Traditional accounts describe them witnessing the burning of their tents, the looting of their possessions, and the profound hardships of captivity, while mourning the loss of their close relatives. Through their reported experiences and recollections, later generations preserved essential aspects of the Karbala narrative. Yet another survivor was Muhammad al-Bāqir, the infant son of Zainul Abedīn, who was later to emerge as the fifth Imām. He is said to have been around 5 years of age when Karbala took place.

The role of these surviving children after Ashura is often less emphasised than that of adult figures like Zainab. Nevertheless, they formed a vital part of the captive group that accompanied Zainab and Imam Ali ibn Husain Zainul Abedīn (the sole adult male survivor from Husain’s immediate family) during their journey to the courts of Kufa and Damascus. Their presence starkly highlighted the far-reaching consequences of the conflict for the Prophet’s family and contributed significantly to the profound emotional and political impact of the speeches attributed to Zainab and Zainul Abedīn in those cities. In this vital sense, the surviving children were not merely passive victims but important witnesses within the historical memory of Karbala. While those who died became central figures in narratives of ultimate sacrifice, it was the survivors who helped preserve and transmit the event’s legacy, ensuring that the tragedy was not forgotten.

Legacy and Enduring Lessons

The children associated with Karbala continue to occupy a place of profound importance in Islamic memory precisely because their stories have been interpreted as embodying a diverse and compelling range of ethical and religious values. In later tradition, Qasim ibn Hasan is often associated with conviction and courage; Abdullah ibn Hasan with spontaneous loyalty; Aun and Muhammad with commitment to principle; Muhammad and Ibrahim with perseverance; Ali Asghar with innocent suffering; and Sakina and Al-Båqir, with patience, resilience, and grief. The surviving daughters of the Prophet’s household are frequently remembered for their crucial, albeit often unheralded, role in preserving and transmitting the memory of the tragedy through oral accounts. Taken together, these narratives suggest that significance within historical and religious traditions is not necessarily linked to age, physical strength, or political authority. Although many of these figures died in childhood, their stories have remained remarkably prominent in communal remembrance for over thirteen centuries.

More than thirteen hundred years after the tragedy of Karbala, the children associated with Imam Husain continue to occupy a notable and deeply resonant place in Islamic historical and devotional traditions. They are remembered as both victims and, in some cases, active participants in a broader narrative concerning moral commitment, justice, and the imperative of remembrance. Through early historical accounts, ritual commemorations such as the Rauza-Khwani and Ta’ziya performances, and a vast body of literary and poetic representations, their diverse experiences continue to shape the interpretative lens through which the events of Karbala are understood and internalised across generations, serving as an enduring testament to the human cost of that fateful day and the timeless values it champions.

---

Select Bibliography

Primary Sources:

· Abu Mikhnaf (d. 774 CE). Maqtal al-Husain. Preserved in al-Tabari’s Tarikh.
· Al-Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir (d. 923 CE). Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk. Translated as The History of al-Ṭabarī, Vol. XIX: The Caliphate of Yazīd b. Mu‘āwiyah, translated by I. K. A. Howard. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
· Al-Baladhuri, Ahmad ibn Yahya (d. 892 CE). Ansab al-Ashraf.
· Al-Khwarizmi, Muwaffaq ibn Ahmad (d. 1172 CE). Maqtal al-Husain.
· Ibn Tawus, Ali ibn Musa (d. 1266 CE). Al-Luhuf fi Qatla al-Tufuf. Translated as The Tragedy of Karbala by A. H. Qureshi. Qum: Ansariyan Publications, n.d.
· Ibn Athir, Ali ibn Muhammad (d. 1233 CE). Al-Kamil fi al-Tarikh.

Secondary Sources: (Selected)

· Aghaie, Kamran Scot, ed. The Women of Karbala: Ritual Performance and Symbolic Discourses in Modern Shi‘i Islam. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2005.
· Hyder, Syed Akbar. Reliving Karbala: Martyrdom in South Asian Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
· Jafri, S. H. M. The Origins and Early Development of Shi‘a Islam. London: Longman, 1979; repr., Qum: Ansariyan Publications, 2000.
· Madelung, Wilferd. The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
· Momen, Moojan. An Introduction to Shi‘i Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shi‘ism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
· Pinault, David. The Shiites: Ritual and Popular Piety in a Muslim Community. London: I. B. Tauris, 1992.
· Vaglieri, L. Veccia. “al-Ḥusayn b. ‘Alī b. Abī Ṭālib.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition, edited by P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C. E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, and W. P. Heinrichs. Leiden: Brill, 1960-2007.

Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi

These days many people opine: what is the need to waste time in attending or organising a majlis? It’s a useless waste of time, energy and resources. Why keep hearing the same nonsense again and again? This essay, on the other hand, tries to argue contrarily, that majālis of Muharram are actually a great way of a learning process: in fact the months of mourning are in fact a period when the University of the Ahlulbayt, the Living University of Muharram, functions and provides us a cheap and easy way to educate ourselves. It is the madrasa of the Ahlulbayt where you gain much.

Let us start by asking two questions: one, what is a majlis? It is an assembly or congregation, in our case, a congregation to mourn the martyrdom of Imām Husain, the grandson of the Prophet at the hands of Yazid and his cohorts. It is a combination of elegy recitations, marsiya and nauha, and an oration. They can be held any time of the year, but specially so during Muharram and Safar, running into the first week of Rabiul Awwal. The second question is: “What is a madrasa?” Is it only a place which imparts religious education or is it much more? In its conventional sense, it is a place of learning, an institution where knowledge is transmitted through structured lessons, where teachers guide students through established curricula, and where the pursuit of understanding is undertaken with seriousness and purpose.

Muharram gatherings, the majalis, are another kind of madrasa, one that has educated millions for more than thirteen centuries without ever constructing a single building, without charging a single fee, and without issuing a single diploma. It operates not within lecture halls but within homes, community centres, mosques, and public spaces. Here people assemble and are taught by various experts, called Zākir. These teachers are scholars, historians, ethicists, storytellers and even professionals, who offer their knowledge freely. Its students are ordinary people who come not to earn credentials but to understand, to reflect, and to grow. Its curriculum is not a fixed syllabus but a living narrative, revolving around the story of Karbala, which reveals new meanings with each retelling. This is the Living Madrasa that this essay seeks to explore.

Most people associate Muharram with mourning, remembrance, and commemoration. While this is certainly true, it is only part of the picture. Muharram is actually a vast educational enterprise, a monumental madrasa whose classrooms extend across continents and whose curriculum has remained relevant through changing ages and societies. Every year, this remarkable institution, as stated, opens its doors for two months and eight days. During this period, people gather in homes, Imāmbādas, mosques, community centres, and even public spaces to attend majālis, gatherings of mourning and remembrance. These assemblies are often viewed simply as religious rituals, but in reality they function as dynamic classrooms where knowledge is imparted, ideas are debated, history is preserved, and moral values are cultivated. This aspect has been recognised and commented over throughout the world. The Islamic Center at New York University recognising this educational dimension, observed that Muharram majalis programmes offer “in-depth religious education, intensive courses and a lecture series that brings in the brightest minds from the Shia community,” functioning as a unique space “for learning, connection, and spiritual growth” (Islamic Center at New York University, 2024). The Imam Ali Foundation in London similarly emphasises that Muharram is not merely an emotional occasion but “a pivotal opportunity to revive religious awareness, renew allegiance to the path of the Ahl al-Bayt, and foster the development of a mission-driven individual who takes Imam Husain as a role model and exemplar” (Imam Ali Foundation, 2026). Contemporary scholarship has increasingly recognised the educational dimension embedded within such religious practices, identifying how these traditions serve as informal mechanisms for transmitting moral and spiritual values. Syed Akbar Hyder’s Reliving Karbala (2006) examines how the Karbala narrative is “appropriated and lived in the contexts and memories of South Asian Muslims and non-Muslims at different times,” demonstrating how various interpretive strategies shape social milieus and contribute to education across communities (Hyder, 2006, p. 10).

The resemblance between Muharram and a formal educational institution is not metaphorical but striking. In any madrasa or university, students are taught by different teachers who approach the same subject from diverse perspectives. A historian may explain political developments, a philosopher may explore ethical implications, and a literary scholar may examine cultural expressions. In academic institutions multiple approaches and perspectives are discussed and inculcated. Together, they provide a comprehensive understanding of a subject. The same process occurs during Muharram. In my childhood and teenage I remember listening to a known surgeon, a philosopher and a theologian in a single day: and the learning was incredible! The same subject but different approaches becomes the mantra.

Throughout the commemorative period, and particularly during the first ten days, different scholars and speakers address audiences on a wide range of themes connected with Karbala. One speaker may discuss the political conditions of the Umayyad period; another may focus on the personality and mission of Imam Husain; a third may examine the role of Abbas ibn Ali; yet another may analyse the contribution of Lady Zainab in preserving and disseminating the message of Karbala. A fourth may talk of principles of physics or even the basics of chemistry! Some focus on theology, others on history, literature, ethics, philosophy, spirituality, or contemporary social concerns. Each lecture adds a new dimension and deepens understanding, training the mind to approach complex questions from multiple angles.

In many communities, the first ten days of Muharram resemble an intensive academic programme. Majālis (plural of majlis) begin early in the morning and continue until late in the evening. Historical accounts indicate that in the early nineteenth century in Awadh, notables held mourning sessions twice daily during the first ten days, with the evening sessions being the best attended. It is not uncommon for participants to attend several gatherings in a single day, moving from one majlis to another much as students move between lecture halls during a conference or seminar. The process is cumulative: each session contributes something new, and by the end of the ten days the participant has engaged with a rich and multifaceted body of knowledge. The first ten days thus form the core curriculum, while the remaining period, up to the fortieth day (Arba’īn), serves as an extended session for deeper reflection and consolidation of the lessons learned. This pedagogical structure, with its sequenced progression from foundational narratives to advanced ethical and theological reflection, mirrors the curriculum design of traditional madrasas where students advance through progressively deeper levels of study.

What makes this educational experience unique is that its central subject is not merely a text, it is humanity itself explained through an event. Karbala functions as a living text that is read, interpreted, and revisited every year. Like all great texts, it reveals new meanings with each reading. A child listening to the story may be inspired by acts of courage and sacrifice, thus beginning the education of the heart through emotional engagement with virtue. A young person may reflect upon questions of loyalty and integrity, engaging the conscience in moral reasoning. An adult may recognise lessons concerning justice, responsibility, and moral choice, exercising the mind in political and ethical analysis. An elderly listener may discover profound insights about patience, faith, and human dignity, deepening the spiritual cultivation of the heart. The event itself remains unchanged, yet every generation finds new meanings within it, and each listener at each stage of life discovers lessons appropriate to their own spiritual and intellectual development. As Hyder (2006, p. 11) notes, “the interpretive and commemorative strategies that undergird Muharram rituals require agency on the part of individuals and communities, whether they act as storytellers, as listeners, or both.”

This emphasis on education and the pursuit of knowledge is deeply rooted in the foundational sources of Islam. The Qur’an repeatedly stresses the importance of learning, reflection, and understanding. The very first revelation to the Prophet Muhammad began with the command, “Iqra” (Read or Recite) (Qur’an 96:1-5), and the sacred text is replete with verses that urge believers to ponder the signs of God, to seek knowledge, and to recognise that those who possess knowledge are elevated in rank: “Allah will raise those who have believed among you and those who were given knowledge, by degrees” (Qur’an 58:11). The Qur’an also instructs: “And it is not for the believers to go forth [to battle] all at once. For there should separate from every division of them a group [remaining] to obtain understanding in the religion and to warn their people when they return to them that they might be cautious” (Qur’an 9:122). Likewise, the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad consistently encouraged the acquisition of knowledge, declaring it an obligation upon every Muslim, male and female. He famously stated: “Seeking knowledge is a duty upon every Muslim” (Ibn Majah, Sunan, Book of the Sunnah), and he prayed for the increase of knowledge, saying: “O God, benefit me with what You have taught me, and teach me what will benefit me, and increase me in knowledge” (Tirmidhi, Sunan, Book of Supplications). Mu’adh ibn Jabal narrated that the Prophet said: “Seeking knowledge for the sake of Allah results in fearing Allah, it is a form of worship, discussing it is an act of glorifying Allah, and being busy in its search is a form of Jihad” (Abu Nu’aym, Hilyat al-Awliya). This prophetic tradition laid the foundation for an educational ethos that would later manifest itself in various institutional forms, including the very madrasas that have shaped Islamic civilisation for centuries.

Perhaps the first formal school to systematically impart education to children and others was established during the Khilafat of Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib. Recognising the critical need for structured learning, Imam Ali organised educational circles in Kufa, where initially the girls were taught, and later, male children were also included. This pioneering institution was remarkable not only for its inclusivity but also for its comprehensive curriculum, which encompassed Qur’anic exegesis, prophetic traditions, jurisprudence, and ethics. Scholarship on the educational principles of Imam Ali has examined his systematic approach to moral and intellectual development. Research drawing on Nahj al-Balaghah, Ghurar al-Hekam, and other Shiite narrative sources has identified that from Imam Ali’s perspective, the sources of knowledge include “revelation and inspiration, reason, the heart, Fitrah, verses of nature, verses of the soul, and history,” while the instruments for acquiring knowledge include “contemplation in the Holy Qur’an, wisdom, sense, discovery and intuition, and taking lessons from the lives of the Ahl al-Bayt” (Rezayat & Rezayat, 2020, p. 15). This epistemological framework, encompassing reason, revelation, and experiential insight, anticipates the holistic education that Muharram continues to provide, engaging the mind through rational inquiry, the heart through spiritual reflection, and the conscience through moral discernment. Studies have also examined Imam Ali’s emphasis on human social responsibilities, noting that from his viewpoint, “human being is naturally a social creature and in order to live in society, they must be in contact with society,” with education playing a crucial role in realising such social responsibilities (Rezvan Khah, Salehi & Sajadi, 2020, p. 8).

It was in this very school that Habib ibn Mazahir, who would later become one of the most distinguished figures of Karbala, received his initial education. His life story, when heard by a child attending a majlis, leaves a deep moral and practical impact. According to historical sources, Habib ibn Mazahir was a companion of Imams Ali, al-Hasan, and al-Husain, and was a member of the Banu Asad tribe. He had helped Ali ibn Abi Talib in the Battle of the Camel, the Battle of Siffin, and the Battle of Nahrawan. He was also Imam Husain’s childhood friend. He studied under the direct guidance of Imam Ali and other prominent companions, excelling in his studies to such an extent that he himself became a well-known teacher in Kufa, specialising in Qur’anic sciences and jurisprudence. His life exemplifies the ideal that education in this tradition is not an end in itself but a preparation for ethical action, where the mind informs the conscience, and the conscience moves the heart to sacrifice for justice. His example introduces the listener to the fact that education has had its importance even from the very early days of Islam.

When Imam Husain, on his journey to Karbala, found himself surrounded by Yazid’s army, he wrote a letter to Habib informing him of the situation and asking him to come to his aid. Ibn A’tham in his Al-Futuh records the events of Muharram 6th, 61 AH, noting that Habib ibn Mazahir said to Imam Husain: “A part of the Bani-Asad clan lives near here; allow me to go to them and ask them to come to your aid” (Ibn A’tham, Al-Futuh, Vol. 5, pp. 91-92; Khwarizmi, Maqtal al-Husayn, Vol. 1, pp. 243-244). Traditional narratives recount that Habib received the letter while having breakfast with his wife and young son. Upon reading it, “he kissed it and tears began to flow from his eyes. His wife asked him what was wrong. Habib said: ‘I have received a letter from my master, Husain. He has asked me to join him in Kerbala. Yazid’s soldiers have surrounded him and are after his life'” (Hujjat, 2009). Habib’s wife urged him to go, saying: “Habib! Your childhood friend has called you. Your master needs your help. What are you waiting for? Go Habib, before it is too late!” Habib managed to escape Kufa with his slave, who also insisted on joining the mission, saying: “Master! You are not being fair. I have served you faithfully for years. Now, I have a chance to serve the son of Bibi Fatemah, and you are asking me to go. Why are you denying me a place in Heaven?” (Hujjat, 2009). This episode reveals how the education of the heart, love for the Prophet’s family and attachment to justice, had so thoroughly permeated Habib’s household that even his wife and servant were moved to prioritise conscience over personal safety.

When Imam Husain wrote to him, he addressed him with the epithet “Mard e Faqīh” (scholar of law), recognising his profound learning and wisdom. This title was not merely honorific; it acknowledged Habib’s deep understanding of the religious and legal dimensions of the mission he was being called to support. Also important to note is that Husain was not beckoning a warrior, but a scholar.

Traditional narratives recount that Imam Husain received Habib with great affection in Karbala, and Bibi Zainab sent her greetings to him, a gesture that moved Habib to tears, reflecting his deep devotion and the honour he felt. Upon hearing that Bibi Zainab had sent greetings to him, “he screamed out in grief and anger. He threw his turban down on to the ground. He slapped his face. Tears rolled down his cheeks as he spoke: ‘What a sad day! What has happened to the household of Bibi Fatemah? The princess! Grand-daughter of the Holy prophet, the daughter of Ali and Fatemah is sending her greetings to an ordinary person like me! Yazid! You beast, you tyrant! What have you done to the household of Bibi Fatemah?'” (Hujjat, 2009). In this moment, the intellectual formation of Habib’s mind as a Faqīh, the spiritual cultivation of his heart expressed through tears and devotion, and the moral development of his conscience manifested in grief and righteous anger all converge, demonstrating precisely the three-dimensional education that Muharram seeks to cultivate.

By responding to Imam Husain’s call, Habib ibn Mazahir embodied the ideal that true knowledge must translate into moral action, that the scholar’s place is not in the ivory tower but on the frontlines of justice. On the day of Ashura, Habib sought permission to go to the battlefield. Imam Husain initially urged him to stay, saying: “Habib, my childhood friend. Stay with me. You give comfort to me, my friend” (Hujjat, 2009). But Habib persisted, and eventually Imam Husain gave his permission. Habib ibn Mazahir rode into the battlefield and fought bravely but was finally overpowered. As he fell to the ground, an enemy soldier cut off his head, the first head to be cut off among the martyrs of Karbala (Hujjat, 2009; Ansab al-Ashraf, Vol. 3, p. 388). His head was tied to a horse and dragged across the land of Karbala. Later, in Syria, his young son Qasim followed the horse carrying his father’s head and asked to bury it, to which the severed head seemed to say: “My son Qasim, you are thinking of burying my head. What about the head of Husain on that spearhead?” (Hujjat, 2009). Habib thus gave his life at the age of seventy-five in the Battle of Karbala, and his grave lies near the shrine of Imam Husain. His life and death offer a powerful pedagogical lesson: the mind’s learning finds its fulfilment in the heart’s devotion, and the heart’s devotion finds its ultimate expression in the conscience’s willingness to sacrifice for truth. This is the education that Muharram imparts, not abstract theory but lived reality, not passive reception but active transformation.

The educational significance of this process is perhaps best understood through lived experience. I never formally studied theology in a madrasa or seminary; my academic training belonged to an entirely different discipline. Yet from childhood onwards, by attending the majālis of Muharram year after year, I acquired much of my understanding of Islam, its history, ethics, philosophy, and moral teachings. It was in these gatherings that I first encountered discussions on justice and oppression, truth and falsehood, sacrifice and responsibility, faith and reason, morality and human dignity. Through the majlis, I came to understand not only what Islam teaches but also how a human being ought to conduct himself in society. The majlis thus served as my madrasa, not a building with classrooms and fees, but a living tradition transmitted through narrative and community. I learnt that one should not bow to unjust or cruel. One has to take a principled stand, whatever the consequences. It taught me Yazid is not to be feared, but faced with conviction.

The majlis taught far more than theology. It imparted adab, the comprehensive Islamic concept of cultured behaviour and refined manners. It taught manners, civility, humility, compassion, self-restraint, respect for others, and responsibility towards society. Through the examples of the Prophet’s family and their companions, one learned how to face adversity with dignity, how to disagree without hatred, how to defend principles without arrogance, and how to remain steadfast without becoming intolerant. In many ways, the majlis became a classroom for learning the art of living itself, cultivating the heart through the example of those who embodied virtue, and educating the conscience through narratives that demanded moral reflection.

What is true in my own case is true for countless others. Across South Asia and throughout the wider Shi’i world, generations of men and women who have never attended formal theological institutions possess a substantial understanding of Islamic history, Qur’anic teachings, ethical principles, and religious practices. Their knowledge was acquired not through formal examinations or degrees but through decades of listening, reflecting, questioning, and participating in the educational culture of Muharram. Research on similar traditions has found that such practices operate as effective informal educational platforms, where participants internalise values through active engagement, and faith-based values are reinforced alongside social-moral values fostering compassion and dignity (Umayah, Abidin & Kusumawati, 2022). The majlis thus performs a remarkable function: it democratises knowledge and makes it accessible to ordinary people, bypassing the barriers of literacy, class, and institutional affiliation. It is a madrasa without entrance examinations, without tuition fees, and without graduation requirements, yet its alumni carry its lessons in their hearts for a lifetime.

In this sense, Muharram provided me with what may best be described as a maktab-e fikr, a school of thought and a framework through which to understand religion, society, and life itself. The lessons learned there extended beyond ritual and devotion. They shaped intellectual outlooks, moral sensibilities, and social attitudes. They offered a lens through which to evaluate power, justice, authority, and human conduct. Unlike formal educational systems that often compartmentalise knowledge, the maktab-e fikr of Muharram presents an integrated worldview, connecting the metaphysical with the ethical, the historical with the contemporary, and the personal with the social. It educates the mind through rigorous historical and theological inquiry, the heart through emotional engagement with the suffering and sacrifice of the Prophet’s family, and the conscience through the persistent moral questions that the narrative of Karbala raises.

There is another aspect of this institution that deserves attention. Modern education is often expensive: schools charge fees, universities demand substantial investments, seminars require registration, and specialised training programmes can be beyond the reach of ordinary people. The Madrasa of Muharram functions according to an entirely different economic model. Its only requirement is time and commitment. The student invests nothing except a willingness to attend, listen, reflect, and learn. He pays neither admission fees, nor tuition fees. Nor are there any kind of hidden charges. In this sense, it embodies the prophetic tradition that knowledge should be accessible to all, regardless of economic means.

Indeed, one might say that it is perhaps the only educational institution where the student is rewarded for attending every class. After the lecture concludes, participants are often offered tabarruk, blessed food or items. This may take the form of meals, sweets, fruit, tea, sharbat (sweet drinks), or sometimes even useful household items and other material gifts distributed in memory of the martyrs of Karbala (Grist, 1995; Pinault, 1999). Historical sources confirm that as early as the 1820s, after the Persian reading in the mourning sessions, there would be an intermission during which servants handed around sweetened rose water to the gathering of mourners (JRI Cole). Thus the student departs not only intellectually enriched and spiritually nourished, but often carrying a tangible token of blessing as well. This practice embodies the generosity that is itself a lesson in adab, teaching that knowledge is a gift to be shared, not a commodity to be hoarded.

There is a deeper significance to this practice. In most educational systems, knowledge is treated as a commodity to be purchased. In the culture of Muharram, knowledge is viewed as a blessing to be shared. The organisers seek no profit; the speakers generally address gatherings as a service to the community; and the listeners are welcomed as honoured guests rather than paying customers. The tabarruk symbolises this ethos of generosity. It is a reminder that learning, remembrance, and service are acts of devotion rather than commercial transactions. This also mirrors the prophetic tradition where the acquisition of knowledge was never meant to be a financial burden; rather, the Prophet and his household encouraged the free circulation of knowledge as a communal obligation and a spiritual merit. In this way, the Madrasa of Muharram preserves and perpetuates the prophetic educational ideal.

Looking back upon decades of attending majālis, one realises that the return on this modest investment of time has been extraordinary. For a few hours spent each day in Muharram gatherings, generations have acquired a knowledge of Islamic history, ethics, theology, literature, and human conduct that many formal educational institutions would struggle to impart. They have received not merely information but a worldview; not merely lessons but a maktab-e fikr. And at the end of each class, they have often gone home carrying tabarruk in their hands and the lessons of Karbala in their hearts. The education of the mind has been complemented by the cultivation of the heart, and both have been directed by a conscience formed through years of moral reflection.

This process resembles the methods employed in the great centres of learning that have existed throughout history. The ancient academies encouraged students to reflect upon questions of truth, justice, and virtue; medieval universities sought to combine knowledge with moral formation; and great Islamic madrasas aimed not merely to produce learned individuals but wise human beings. Muharram shares this broader understanding of education: its objective is not simply to convey information but to transform character. It is a madrasa that educates the whole person, mind, heart, and conscience, and measures its success not by examination results but by the quality of lives lived in accordance with truth and justice.

The majlis is therefore much more than a lecture. It is a forum for reflection and self-examination. Beneath every narration lies a series of profound questions: What should an individual do when confronted by tyranny? Is power more important than principle? Can truth be compromised for personal gain? What responsibilities do human beings owe to society and to their own conscience? These questions are as relevant today as they were in seventh-century Iraq. The story of Karbala provides a framework through which successive generations continue to engage with them. As Hyder (2006, p. 11) observes, “an engagement with the story of Karbala is a process through which one is simultaneously involved in shaping one’s identity in the world.” In this sense, the educational process of Muharram is not merely about acquiring information but about forming individuals who can navigate the moral complexities of their time. It is the education of the conscience, preparing individuals to recognise injustice and respond with courage.

Ultimately, the purpose of education is not merely to produce informed individuals but to cultivate wisdom and character. This is precisely what Muharram seeks to achieve. It teaches that knowledge without conscience is incomplete and that learning must lead to ethical action. The lessons of Karbala are not intended to remain confined to the majlis; they are meant to shape everyday conduct and influence the choices individuals make throughout their lives. In this way, Muharram serves as a perpetual guardian of the prophetic tradition of seeking knowledge, and it reaffirms the Qur’anic vision of an educated, conscious, and morally responsible community. The mind is informed so that the heart may be moved, and the heart is moved so that the conscience may act; this is the threefold education that the Living Madrasa of Muharram has imparted for over thirteen centuries.

For more than thirteen centuries, this extraordinary madrasa has continued its work. Every year, for two months and eight days, its classrooms reopen. During the first ten days, lectures begin in the morning and continue until late in the evening. The teachers may change, the audiences may change, and societies may change, but the central lesson remains constant. Through the remembrance of Karbala, Muharram continues to educate minds, refine hearts, preserve historical memory, and nurture a commitment to truth and justice. It remains one of humanity’s most remarkable educational institutions, a madrasa without walls whose graduates are measured not by the certificates they receive but by the values they embody. Its fees are paid only in time, its rewards begin immediately, and its ultimate degree is the cultivation of an informed mind, a compassionate heart, and a conscientious life.

Those who attend its sessions with an open heart and a seeking mind discover that the this madrasa offers an education that no formal institution can replicate, an education that does not end with graduation but continues to shape the soul long after the final majlis has concluded, echoing through the choices one makes, the principles one defends, and the legacy one leaves behind. It is, in the truest sense, an education for eternity, one that transforms mere listeners into bearers of a living tradition, and turns the remembrance of a tragedy into the foundation of a life of meaning, purpose, and unwavering commitment to justice. In a world that often separates knowledge from virtue, intellect from compassion, and learning from conscience, the this school insists that these cannot be divided, for the mind that learns without the heart is cold, the heart that feels without the conscience is unmoored, and the conscience that acts without knowledge is blind. Muharram brings them together, educating the whole human being for a life of truth, justice, and compassion. And in doing so, it fulfils the deepest purpose of all true education: to make us not merely more knowledgeable, but more fully human.

---

Bibliography

Primary Sources

1. The Qur’an. (Verses cited: 9:122; 58:11; 96:1-5).
2. Ibn Majah, Sunan, Book of the Sunnah. (Tradition: “Seeking knowledge is a duty upon every Muslim”).
3. Tirmidhi, Sunan, Book of Supplications. (Tradition: “O God, benefit me with what You have taught me…”).
4. Abu Nu’aym, Hilyat al-Awliya. (Tradition of Mu’adh ibn Jabal on seeking knowledge).
5. Ibn A’tham, Al-Futuh, Vol. 5, pp. 91-92. (Account of Habib ibn Mazahir in Karbala).
6. Khwarizmi, Maqtal al-Husayn, Vol. 1, pp. 243-244. (Account of Habib ibn Mazahir’s actions).
7. Ansab al-Ashraf, Vol. 3, p. 388. (Biographical information on Habib ibn Mazahir).
8. Nahj al-Balaghah. (Collection of sermons, letters, and sayings of Imam Ali).
9. Ghurar al-Hekam. (Collection of sayings of Imam Ali).

Secondary Sources

1. Hujjat, Stanmore. (2009). “Habib ibn Mazahir.” Traditional narrative account of Habib’s life, escape from Kufa, arrival in Karbala, and martyrdom. Available at: https://hujjat.org/habib-ibn-mazahir/.
2. Hyder, Syed Akbar. (2006). Reliving Karbala: Martyrdom in South Asian Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Imam Ali Foundation, London. (2026). “General Recommendations for Leaders and Staff of Islamic Centers and Institutions on the Occasion of Muharram 1447 AH.” Guidance document recognising Muharram’s role in education and religious awareness.
4. Islamic Center at New York University. (2024). “ICNYU Shia Chaplaincy & Muharram Majlis Campaign.” Description of Muharram programmes and educational initiatives.
5. Pinault, David. The Shiites, 2nd ed. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers, 2011.
6. Rezayat, Ghulam Hussein & Rezayat, Fatemeh. (2020).  “Epistemology from Imam Ali’s Point of View with Emphasis on Educational Implications.” Research in Islamic Education Issues 28, no. 46, pp. 5–30.
7. Rezvan Khah, Salman; Salehi, Akbar; Sajadi, Seyed Morteza. (2020). “Human Social Responsibilities from the Perspective of Imam Ali, with Emphasis on Nahj al-Balaghah and the Role of Education in Their Realization.” Islam and Social Studies 8, no. 1 (2020): 5–36.
8. Juan RI Cole. Roots of North Indian Shiism in Iran and Iraq: Religion and State in Awadh, 1722–1859. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988Historical accounts of Muharram mourning sessions in Awadh during the early nineteenth century.
9. Umayah, Rina Dewi; Abidin, Ahmad Zainal; Kusumawati, Ita Rahmania. (2022). “Basmalah as a Protection for Bala’: The Tradition of Writing Basmalah Every 1 Muharram at Islamic Boarding Schools Al-Mahrusiyah Lirboyo Kediri.” Jurnal At-Tibyan 7, no. 2 (2022)..
10. Hollister, John Norman. The Shi’a of India. Reprint edition. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation (distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal), 1979. 
11. S Athar Abbas Rizvi, A Socio-Intellectual History of the Isna Ashari Shi’is in India, Canberra, 1986 (2 volumes)
12. Vernon James Schubel, Religious Performance in Contemporary Islam: Shi’i Devotional Rituals in South Asia.
    Schubel explicitly analyses the majlis as a mechanism through which religious knowledge, historical memory, and communal values are transmitted across generations. He shows how listeners learn theology, history, ethics, and social norms through participation in Muharram rituals rather than through formal religious schooling. His work comes very close to viewing the majlis as a pedagogical institution.
13. T. P. A. Cooper, “‘Live has an atmosphere of its own’: Azadari, ethical atmospheres and mediation in Shi’i Muslim London”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (2022). Cooper examines the majlis as a space of ethical formation where listeners learn how to feel, think, and behave as moral subjects. 
14. Michael Fischer and Mehdi Abedi,
    Debating Muslims: Cultural Dialogues in Postmodernity and Tradition.
    Their discussions of Shi’i discourse emphasise the majlis as a setting where knowledge is collectively produced and transmitted.

Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi

Every year, as the month of Muharram arrives, millions of people across the world turn their thoughts towards Karbala, where one of the most profound moral dramas in human history unfolded. The memory of Imam Husain ibn Ali, the beloved grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, and his companions who sacrificed their lives on the tenth of Muharram in 61 AH (680 CE), continues to inspire people of all backgrounds. Their stand against tyranny, injustice, and the abuse of power transformed Karbala from a historical event into an eternal symbol of resistance and moral courage.

Yet the story of Karbala is often told primarily through the heroism of its men. We remember Husain, Abbas, Ali Akbar, Qasim ibn Hasan, Habib ibn Muzahir, Zuhair ibn Qain, Muslim ibn Awsaja, John the Ethiopian, and the other martyrs who gave their lives in defence of truth. Their sacrifice deserves every tribute that history has bestowed upon them. However, to focus solely on the men of Karbala is to overlook a vital dimension of the tragedy and its enduring legacy.

Karbala was not merely a battlefield. It was a revolution of conscience. Like all great revolutions, it required not only those who were willing to die for a cause but also those who were willing to live for it after unimaginable loss. The women of Karbala were not passive spectators who happened to accompany Husain. It is only recently that role is now being emphasised as central to the mission of Husain. Here I am going to summarise their role and significance.

The women were essential participants in the mission of Husain. Their courage, endurance, leadership, eloquence, and steadfast faith ensured that the sacrifice of Ashura would not vanish into the sands of history. Indeed, one may confidently argue that without the women of Karbala, there would be no Karbala as we know it today.

One of the first questions that arises is why Imam Husain chose to take the women and children of his household on a journey whose dangers he fully understood. Had his purpose been merely political or military, their presence would have been unnecessary and even risky. Yet Husain deliberately chose to bring his sisters, wives, daughters, nieces, and the families of his companions. Their presence reveals the true nature of his movement. Husain knew that he and his supporters would likely be martyred. He also knew that the struggle would not end with their deaths. The women would become the witnesses of Karbala. They would preserve its memory, expose the crimes of the Umayyad regime, and communicate its message to future generations. Ashura was only the first chapter of the revolution. The second chapter would be written by the women.

The central figure among them was undoubtedly Janāb e Zainab bint Ali, the daughter of Imam Ali and Janāb e Fatima, and the granddaughter of the Prophet Muhammad. Zainab possessed extraordinary qualities of character. She combined intellectual brilliance with spiritual depth, courage with dignity, and eloquence with unwavering faith. Throughout her life she had witnessed many trials, but nothing could compare with the horrors she endured at Karbala. She watched one after another as the men of her family entered the battlefield and embraced martyrdom. She saw her nephews and cousins fall. She witnessed the death of Qasim ibn Hasan, the young son of Imam Hasan, who longed for martyrdom beside his uncle. She saw Ali Akbar, whose appearance and character most closely resembled the Prophet, cut down in the prime of his youth. She witnessed the martyrdom of Abbas ibn Ali, the standard-bearer of Karbala, whose loyalty and devotion have become legendary. Finally, she saw her own brother, Husain, surrounded by enemies and martyred after enduring thirst, exhaustion, and isolation.

Yet the true greatness of Zainab emerged after the martyrdom of Husain. When the battle ended, the tents were looted and set ablaze. The surviving women and children were left frightened, exhausted, and vulnerable. The men who had protected them were gone. At this moment of complete devastation, Zainab became the leader of the survivors. She gathered the terrified children. She comforted the bereaved women. She protected the sick Imam Ali ibn Husain Zayn al-Abidin, whose illness had prevented him from fighting but whose survival was essential for the continuation of the Prophet’s family. When soldiers threatened his life, Zainab reportedly shielded him with her own body and declared that they would have to kill her before harming him. The courage she displayed after Ashura was every bit as remarkable as the courage shown by the martyrs on the battlefield. The men had attained the honour of martyrdom. Zainab and the other women had to endure the pain of survival. It is remarkable to note that before the martyrdom of Husain, she remains in the shadows, only to emerge as a beacon, a leader after his massacre, protecting not only the household, the ailing Imām Zainul Abedīn, but also spreading the message of Imām Husain. She acted as the second Husain, and no tear fell from eyes then on, which were now focused on the mission.

The captives were taken first to Kufa and later to Damascus. The Umayyad authorities intended to present them as defeated rebels and thereby legitimise the massacre. Instead, Zainab transformed captivity into resistance. In Kufa she addressed the crowds who had gathered to witness the arrival of the prisoners. Many wept when they realised that these captives were the family of the Prophet. Zainab condemned the people for their betrayal of Husain after inviting him to their city. Her speech exposed their hypocrisy and forced them to confront their own responsibility for the tragedy. Through her words, sorrow was transformed into moral accountability.

Her most famous confrontation occurred in the court of Yazid in Damascus. Yazid believed that he had achieved a complete victory. The heads of the martyrs had been displayed before him. The surviving members of the Prophet’s family stood before his court as prisoners. The occasion was intended to celebrate the triumph of state power over resistance. Instead, Zainab transformed the court into a tribunal of justice. Standing before the ruler of the Muslim empire, surrounded by his officials and supporters, she delivered one of the most powerful speeches in Islamic history. Fearless and composed, she challenged Yazid’s claims to legitimacy and condemned his treatment of the Prophet’s family. She reminded him that worldly power is temporary and that ultimate judgement belongs to God. Most significantly, she declared that despite all his efforts, he would never succeed in erasing the memory of Husain and his companions. He might kill them, display their heads, imprison their families, and command vast armies, but he could not extinguish the truth for which they had died. History has vindicated her words. More than thirteen centuries later, the names of Husain and Zainab continue to inspire millions, while Yazid’s name remains synonymous with oppression and injustice.

After release from prison, she was the first to organise meetings where she would narrate to those present not only the travails of Karbala, but the message for which it all happened.

Zainab thus became the first and greatest interpreter and reporter of Karbala. She transformed a military defeat into a moral victory. Through her speeches, actions, and steadfastness, she ensured that the message of Husain reached far beyond the battlefield. For this reason many scholars have observed that Karbala consisted of two interconnected struggles. The first was fought by Husain with the sword. The second was fought by Zainab with words. Both were necessary for the success of the revolution. If Husain gave Karbala its blood, Zainab gave it its voice. She was, in the truest sense, the real ambassador of Husain, not merely in the court of Yazid but throughout the journey of captivity, carrying his message to every town and every gathering she encountered. Her role in percolating the message of Husain to the world cannot be overstated; she ensured that the revolution would not be confined to a single day or a single place but would resonate across centuries and continents. In her seminal work Batalat Karbala (The Heroine of Karbala), the Egyptian scholar A’isha Abd al-Rahman (Bint al-Shati) presents Zainab as a model of piety, knowledge, and strength, tracing her life from childhood to her final days and emphasising her role as a Qur’anic scholar and teacher in Medina, long before the tragedy unfolded. Abd al-Rahman also highlights the power of Zainab’s orations in Kufa and Damascus, arguing that her eloquence was not merely instinctive but the product of deep learning and spiritual preparation. The Pakistani scholar Muhammad Hasanayn al-Sabiqi, in his work Marqad al-Aqilah Zaynab (The Shrine of the Noble Zainab), builds upon these earlier hagiographies to establish the centrality of Zainab in Shi`a history, arguing for her equal standing with her brothers and her complete preparedness for the trials she would endure. This view is reinforced by contemporary scholars such as Tahera Qutbuddin, who in her analysis of the orations of Zainab and Umm Kulthum demonstrates how these speeches functioned as masterpieces of rhetorical resistance, transforming the court of Yazid from a place of triumph into a space of moral reckoning.

Alongside Zainab stood Umm Kulthum, another daughter of Ali and Fatima. Though less frequently discussed, her contribution was also significant. Her speeches in Kufa reinforced the message of Karbala and condemned those who had abandoned Husain. Through her courage and eloquence she helped ensure that the tragedy would be remembered not merely as an episode of suffering but as a lesson in responsibility and moral choice. She stood shoulder to shoulder with her sister, a pillar of strength in the darkest of hours. Qutbuddin’s work has drawn particular attention to the rhetorical power of both sisters’ speeches, noting how their words functioned as a form of non-violent resistance that complemented the physical sacrifice of the martyrs.

The younger women and children of Karbala likewise played a crucial role in shaping its memory. Among them, Sakina, the beloved daughter of Husain, occupies a unique place in the hearts of believers. If Qasim ibn Hasan symbolises youthful sacrifice among the men of Karbala, Sakina symbolises youthful endurance among its women. The image of the thirsty child searching for her father after his martyrdom has become one of the most moving symbols of Ashura. Yet Sakina represents more than sorrow. Through her suffering she became a witness to oppression. Her experiences revealed the cruelty of the regime more effectively than any political argument. The suffering of children stripped away every claim to legitimacy that Yazid’s supporters might have advanced. An army can justify a battle. It cannot justify the suffering of innocent children. Sakina as the child at Karbala and Sakina as the prisoner embody the full arc of this tragedy, from innocence to endurance. In one version of history, however, she is depicted as an accomplished, articulate scholar later in life, suggesting that perhaps another daughter of Husain survived and grew to carry forward his legacy of learning and piety. This tradition reminds us that the women of Karbala were not merely victims; they were also bearers of knowledge and wisdom. Contemporary scholars such as Shemeem Burney Abbas have explored this figure in works like Sakineh, the Narrator of Karbala, which provides an ethnographic account of how Sakina’s story continues to animate women’s mourning rituals, particularly in South Asia, where her suffering is recounted with profound emotional resonance.

Equally significant was Rubab, the wife of Imam Husain and the mother of Sakina and Ali Asghar. Rubab witnessed the martyrdom of her husband and the killing of her infant son, Ali Asghar, who was struck by an arrow while in his father’s arms. Few experiences in human history can equal such pain. Yet Rubab remained steadfast. Her mourning became an act of remembrance and resistance. She refused to allow the tragedy to be forgotten and devoted herself to preserving the memory of Husain. In doing so, she demonstrated that grief itself can become a form of protest against injustice.

Another woman of exceptional stature was Umm al-Farwa, the mother of Imam Zain al-Abidin. Her noble lineage and her role in nurturing the future Imam ensured that the prophetic legacy continued through the most difficult of times. Her patience and fortitude in the face of unimaginable loss provided a foundation upon which the surviving family could rebuild. Likewise, Fizza, the devoted servant of Fatima Zahra and companion of the household, stood by the women of Karbala with unwavering loyalty. Her presence reminds us that the revolution of Husain was not confined to bloodlines but embraced all who shared his commitment to truth and justice.

The mothers of Karbala deserve equal recognition. Every martyr who fell on Ashura had first been nurtured by a mother who instilled in him the values of faith, courage, and loyalty. The mother of Wahab ibn Abdullah Kalbi is among the most celebrated examples. Rather than urging her son to save himself, she encouraged him to stand beside Husain. Her commitment illustrates the fact that the spirit of Karbala extended beyond individual heroes to entire families united by principle. Similarly, the wives of Husain’s companions shared in the sacrifices of Ashura. The wife of Wahab remained steadfast despite witnessing the martyrdom of her husband. The families of companions such as John the Ethiopian endured loss and suffering alongside the Prophet’s family. Their presence demonstrates that Karbala united people from different ethnic, social, and cultural backgrounds around a common commitment to justice and truth.

Perhaps the greatest contribution of the women of Karbala was their role in preserving memory. They were the first mourners of Husain. They were the first narrators of Ashura. They were the first to recount the sufferings of the martyrs and explain the significance of their sacrifice. In a very real sense, the tradition of majlis and remembrance begins with them. Every gathering held in memory of Husain today continues a practice first established by Zainab, Umm Kulthum, Rubab, Umm al-Farwa, Sakina, Fizza, and the surviving women of the Prophet’s household. Through their testimony and mourning, the story of Karbala was preserved and transmitted across generations. The preservation of Karbala was not achieved by rulers, armies, or institutions. It was achieved by women who refused to allow truth to be forgotten. The contemporary scholarship collected in the edited volume The Women of Karbala: Ritual Performance and Symbolic Discourses in Modern Shii Islam (University of Texas Press, 2005) explores this legacy in depth, examining how women’s roles in Karbala rituals have evolved across Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, India, Pakistan, and the United States. Within this volume, Syed Akbar Hyder’s chapter Sayyedeh Zaynab: The Conqueror of Damascus and Beyond analyses Zainab’s transformation into a powerful symbol of resistance, while Lara Z. Deeb’s From Mourning to Activism: Sayyedeh Zaynab, Lebanese Shii Women, and the Transformation of Ashura explores how her example has inspired contemporary social and political activism. These modern studies confirm what the earliest historians, including al-Tabari in his Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk and Ibn Sad in his biographical compilations, first documented: that the women of Karbala were not passive victims but active agents in shaping the historical and theological significance of the tragedy. Al-Tabari, drawing upon the earlier work of Abu Mikhnaf, provides one of the most comprehensive classical narratives of the events, including the extended role of Zainab in the aftermath, while Ibn Sad and al-Baladhuri offer crucial genealogical details that confirm the names and relationships of the women who survived.

The history of Karbala therefore belongs as much to its women as to its men. Abbas embodied loyalty, but so did Zainab. Qasim embraced martyrdom, but Sakina embraced suffering with equal courage. Husain resisted oppression through sacrifice, while Zainab resisted it through testimony. The martyrs demonstrated how to die for truth. The women demonstrated how to live for truth after catastrophe. Their contributions were different, but they were not lesser. The late Iranian intellectual Ali Shariati, whose writings on Karbala have profoundly influenced modern understandings of the tragedy, universalised Zainab’s example, portraying her as a paradigm of political struggle accessible to all, transcending her gender. In his influential work Red Shiism vs. Black Shiism and other writings, Shariati presents Zainab as the archetype of active, engaged faith. Similarly, the scholar Ali Rahnema has emphasised that Zainab’s leadership in the aftermath of Ashura represents a form of resistance that is no less heroic than the battlefield sacrifice of her brother, framing her role as essential to the revolution’s enduring success.

It is crucial, however, to move beyond viewing the women of Karbala merely as objects of sympathy or figures to be pitied for their suffering. To reduce them to this role is to misunderstand their true significance entirely. They were not weak individuals upon whom we are invited to weep; they were powerful, resolute, and formidable women who set before us examples of loyalty, courage, and unwavering principle that are worthy of emulation in our own lives. Zainab was not a passive victim awaiting rescue; she was a leader, an orator, and a strategist. Sakina was not merely a weeping child; she was a witness whose endurance exposed the moral bankruptcy of tyranny. Rubab was not simply a grieving widow; she was a guardian of memory whose steadfastness ensured that the sacrifice of her husband would never be forgotten. These women do not invite our pity; they demand our respect and our resolve. They challenge us to ask whether we possess the same courage, the same loyalty, and the same commitment to truth that they displayed in the most trying circumstances imaginable. Their example is not confined to the past; it is a living call to conscience that speaks directly to the challenges of our own time. The women of Karbala demonstrate that true strength is revealed not in the absence of suffering but in the refusal to be defeated by it. They show us that loyalty to principle, devotion to justice, and unwavering faith are not abstract ideals but practical virtues that can transform the world.

The women of Karbala were the indispensable pillars upon which Husain’s revolution ultimately rested. Without them, the tragedy might have been remembered only as a lost battle. Because of them, it became one of humanity’s greatest moral lessons. If the martyrs won immortality through their blood, the women ensured that this immortality would be known to the world. If Husain died for the truth, Zainab ensured that the truth of Husain would never die.

For this reason the women of Karbala must be remembered not merely as survivors of a tragedy but as architects of its enduring legacy. Their courage, faith, endurance, and leadership transformed a battlefield into a universal symbol of resistance against tyranny and injustice. Without the women of Karbala, there would have been no living memory of Ashura. Without Zainab, there would have been no enduring voice of Husain’s revolution. And without their sacrifice, the message of Karbala would never have reached the hearts of humanity.

---

Sources and Further Reading

Primary Historical Sources

Al-Tabari, Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk (History of Prophets and Kings), 10th century CE. Draws upon the earlier work of Abu Mikhnaf, one of the first historians to document the martyrdom of Husayn.

Ibn Sa`d (d. 845 CE), Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, provides crucial biographical and genealogical details about the Prophet’s family.

Al-Baladhuri (d. 892 CE), Ansab al-Ashraf, offers genealogical information confirming the names and relationships of the women who survived Karbala.

Key Secondary Works

A’isha Abd al-Rahman (Bint al-Shati), Batalat Karbala (The Heroine of Karbala). Presents Zainab as a model of piety, knowledge, and strength, emphasising her role as a Qur’anic scholar and the power of her orations.

Muhammad Hasanayn al-Sabiqi, Marqad al-Aqilah Zaynab (The Shrine of the Noble Zainab). Establishes the centrality of Zainab in Shia history and argues for her equal standing with her brothers.

The Women of Karbala: Ritual Performance and Symbolic Discourses in Modern Shi`i Islam (University of Texas Press, 2005). Edited collection exploring women’s roles in Karbala rituals across Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, India, Pakistan, and the United States. Includes:

· Syed Akbar Hyder, ‘Sayyedeh Zaynab: The Conqueror of Damascus and Beyond’
· Shemeem Burney Abbas, ‘Sakineh, the Narrator of Karbala’
· Lara Z. Deeb, ‘From Mourning to Activism: Sayyedeh Zaynab, Lebanese Shi`i Women, and the Transformation of Ashura’

Tahera Qutbuddin, Arabic Oration: Art and Function, and her scholarly articles on the orations of Zainab and Umm Kulthum, which analyse these speeches as masterpieces of rhetorical resistance.

Ali Shariati, Red Shiism vs. Black Shi`ism and other writings on Karbala. Universalises Zainab’s example as a paradigm of political struggle accessible to all, transcending her gender.

Ali Rahnema, An Islamic Utopian: A Political Biography of Ali Shariati emphasises Zainab’s leadership in the aftermath of Ashura as a form of resistance no less heroic than battlefield sacrifice.

Yasmin Rahimi, Traces of Zaynab in Shi’i Memory, Martyrdom, and Resistance (2025). Rahimi argues that Zainab’s survival, witnessing, and public testimony reveal an alternative mode of resistance that complements and even transcends the paradigm of physical martyrdom.

Amina Inloes in her work on the Karbala narrative, (especially The Women Question in Islamic Studies) stresses that the enduring power of Karbala owes much to the preservation and transmission of the event by Zainab and the surviving members of the Prophet’s family.  

Ibrahim Amini, The Victory of Truth: The Life of Zaynab bint Ali. It recounts the life and legacy of Zaynab bint Ali, focusing on her moral strength, eloquence, and role in preserving the message of Karbala. The work is widely read in Shia Islamic circles for its spiritual and historical insights. The work contributes significantly to contemporary understandings of Zaynab’s enduring symbolism as “the Messenger of Karbala,” a figure of truth and resilience in Shia thought.

सैयद अली नदीम रेज़ावी

इंसानियत की नैतिक और सियासी सोच को आकार देने वाले बहुत सारे वाकियों में से कुछ ही कर्बला की तरह दिलों पर गहरा असर छोड़ते हैं। कर्बला के मैदान में इमाम हुसैन इब्न अली की शहादत को तेरह सदियाँ बीत चुकी हैं, फिर भी यह दर्दनाक वाकया आज भी लोगों को सोचने, रोने, सीखने और प्रेरणा लेने पर मजबूर करता है। कर्बला सिर्फ एक छोटे से गिरोह और एक ताकतवर सरकार के बीच लड़ी गई जंग नहीं थी। न ही यह सिर्फ खिलाफत की सियासी जंग थी। यह सबसे बढ़कर, ज़मीर की परीक्षा थी। इसने हर इंसान को सच्चाई और ताकत, इंसाफ और सुविधा, नैतिक पकड़ और दुनियावी फायदे के बीच चुनाव करने पर मजबूर कर दिया। इस ऐतिहासिक वर्णन के लिए बुनियादी स्रोतों में अल-तबरी की तारीख अल-रुसुल वा अल-मुलुक, इब्न अल-असीर की अल-कामिल फी अल-तारीख, और इब्न कसीर की किताब अल-बिदाया वा अल-निहाया शामिल हैं। जैसा कि आरोन एम. हैगलर द इकोज़ ऑफ़ फितना में बताते हैं, कर्बला के मतलब को नए सिरे से समझाने की चाहत इन मुअर्रिखों की तहरीर के बीच में है, और संदर्भ के उन पलों में छोटी-छोटी तब्दीली भी उनके मतलब को पूरी तरह बदल देती है।

कर्बला को खास अहमियत देने वाली बात यह है कि यह वाकया पैगंबर मुहम्मद की जीती-जागती याद के दौरान हुआ। उस वक्त बहुत से सहाबा जीवित थे जिन्होंने पैगंबर को देखा था, उनके खुत्बे सुने थे, उनके साथ जंग लड़ी थी और उनकी तालीमात को दूसरों तक पहुँचाया था। कर्बला और पैगंबर के जीवनकाल के बीच की दूरी बहुत कम थी। फिर भी जब इमाम हुसैन ने यज़ीद इब्न मुआविया की हुकूमत को मानने से इनकार कर दिया और खिलाफत को मौरूसी बादशाहत में बदलने को चुनौती दी, तो मुसलमान समाज गहरे बंटवारे का शिकार हो गया। कुछ हुसैन के साथ खड़े हुए। कुछ ने उनसे हमदर्दी तो जताई मगर कुछ नहीं किया। कुछ ने बीच का रास्ता अपनाया। दूसरों ने खुद को हाकिमों की सरकार से जोड़ लिया। इस मायने में, कर्बला सिर्फ हुसैन की परीक्षा नहीं बल्कि पूरी एक पीढ़ी की परीक्षा बन गई।

कर्बला की गहरी तारीख को समझने के लिए, पहले कुरैश कबीले के अंदरूनी हालात को देखना होगा, जिस कबीले से हुसैन और यज़ीद दोनों ताल्लुक रखते थे। कुरैश एकजुट कबीला नहीं था। वे कई खानदानों में बँटे हुए थे, जिनमें सबसे मशहूर बनू हाशिम और बनू उमय्या थे। इस्लाम से पहले, ये खानदान मक्का समाज में इज्जत, रुतबा और रहनुमाई के लिए आपस में लड़ते थे। बनू हाशिम को काबा और हाजियों को सुविधाएँ देने की वजह से बड़ी इज्जत हासिल थी। बनू उमय्या, दूसरी तरफ, कबीले की सबसे अमीर और सियासी तौर पर सबसे ताकतवर शाखाओं में से एक थे।

जब पैगंबर मुहम्मद ने अपना पैगाम सुनाया, तो सबसे सख्त मुखालिफत बनू उमय्या के बड़े लोगों से आई, जिनमें अबू सुफयान इब्न हर्ब भी शामिल थे। फिर भी मक्का की फतह ने इन रिश्तों को बदल दिया। पहले के मुखालिफ इस्लाम क़बूल करके नई जमात में शामिल हो गए। पैगंबर ने जानबूझ कर सुलह की कोशिश की और क़बायली अदावतों से ऊपर उठने की कोशिश की। कुछ देर के लिए, ऐसा लगा कि जाहिलियत की ये अदावतें एक बड़े नैतिक और मज़हबी नज़ारे के सामने मिट गई हैं।

हालाँकि, पैगंबर की मौत के बाद इख्तियार और रहनुमाई के सवालों ने धीरे-धीरे उन दरारों को फिर से खोल दिया जो कभी पूरी तरह नहीं भरी थीं। अबू बकर और उमर की खिलाफत के दौरान, ये तनाव काबू में थे। उस्मान के ज़माने में, जो खुद बनू उमय्या के थे, उमावियों का असर तेजी से बढ़ते साम्राज्य में फैल गया। उस्मान की शहादत और उसके बाद इमाम अली और मुआविया के बीच जंग ने इन छिपी हुई दरारों को सबके सामने ला दिया।

फिर भी इन जंगों को सिर्फ क़बायली अदावतों के नाम पर नहीं समझा जा सकता। अली के हिमायतियों में बहुत से गैर-हाशमी भी थे, जबकि मुआविया के बहुत से हिमायतियों का बनू उमय्या से कोई खास लगाव नहीं था। मसले तेजी से इंसाफ, हुकूमत, इख्तियार और इस्लामी रियासत की असलियत जैसे सवालों के इर्द-गिर्द घूमने लगे। जब तक हुसैन ने यज़ीद का सामना किया, तब तक यह जंग क़बायली वफादारी से कहीं आगे निकल चुकी थी।

कर्बला के सबसे हैरतअंगेज़ पहलुओं में से एक यह है कि यह दर्दनाक वाकया पैगंबर मुहम्मद की जीती-जागती याद में हुआ। उनके बहुत से सहाबा 61 हिजरी / 680 ईस्वी में अभी ज़िंदा थे जब इमाम हुसैन ने उमय्यद हाकिम यज़ीद इब्न मुआविया का सामना किया। फिर भी इस मुसीबत के सामने उनके जवाब एक जैसे नहीं थे।

आम ख़याल के उलट, बहुत कम सहाबा शरीकन हुसैन के लश्कर में या उनके खिलाफ लड़ने वाली फौज में मौजूद थे। कर्बला के ज़्यादातर प्रमुख किरदार अगली पीढ़ी, ताबिऊन से थे। सहाबा में से जिन्होंने रिवायतन इमाम हुसैन का साथ दिया और शहादत पाई, उनमें अनस इब्न अल-हारिस अल-काहिली शामिल हैं। दूसरे, जैसे जाबिर इब्न अब्दुल्लाह अल-अंसारी, सहल इब्न साद अल-साइदी, और अबू सईद अल-खुदरी, अहल अल-बैत से अपनी मुहब्बत की वजह से याद किए जाते हैं, हालाँकि बुढ़ापे और हालात ने उनकी शरीकत को रोका।

बहुत से मशहूर सहाबा, जिनमें अब्दुल्लाह इब्न उमर, अब्दुल्लाह इब्न अब्बास, अनस इब्न मालिक, और जैद इब्न अरकम शामिल हैं, ने हुसैन का साथ नहीं दिया। उनकी वजहें अलग-अलग थीं। कुछ का ख़याल था कि बग़ावत से सिर्फ और ज़्यादा खून-खराबा होगा, जबकि दूसरों ने सियासी तटस्थता की राह अपना ली। खास बात यह है कि इस बात के बहुत कम सबूत हैं कि बड़े जीवित सहाबा ने कर्बला में इमाम हुसैन के खिलाफ जंग लड़ी। जिन लोगों ने उनके खिलाफ जंगी मुहिम की कमान संभाली और उसे अंजाम दिया, जैसे उबैदुल्लाह इब्न जियाद, उमर इब्न साद, शिम्र इब्न धिल-जौशन, और दूसरे, काफी हद तक नौजवान पीढ़ी से ताल्लुक रखते थे।

इन अलग-अलग जवाबों की तारीखी अहमियत इस बात में है कि कर्बला पूरी जमात के लिए ज़मीर की परीक्षा बन गया। पैगंबर से क़ुर्बत ने कोई एक सियासी रुख पैदा नहीं किया। कुछ ने हुसैन का साथ दिया, कुछ ने हमदर्दी की, कुछ ने सावधानी की सलाह दी, और दूसरों ने उमावी हुकूमत के साथ समझौता कर लिया। इस तरह कर्बला हमें याद दिलाता है कि न तो पैगंबर की सोहबत, न ही शरीफ़ खानदान, न ही माज़ी की कामयाबियाँ किसी को तारीख के नैतिक फैसलों से बरी करती हैं। लोगों का फैसला आखिरकार इस बात पर नहीं हुआ कि वे कौन थे, बल्कि इस बात पर हुआ कि उन्होंने सच्चाई और ताकत की जंग में क्या किया।

इससे पहले कि हम उन लोगों का जायज़ा लें जिन्होंने इमाम हुसैन के खिलाफ सक्रिय रूप से जंग लड़ी, सहाबा के रुतबे को परखने के लिए एक बुनियादी उसूल क़ायम करना बेहद ज़रूरी है। सुनहरी उसूल यह है कि सिर्फ वही सहाबा मोहतरम और महबूब हैं जो सकलैन (क़ुरान और इत्रत अहलुलबैत अलैहिमुस्सलाम) से तमस्सुक और वफादारी करते रहे, इत्तिबा करते रहे और मवद्दत फिल क़ुर्बा की राह पर रहे।

इस उसूल को सामने रखते हुए, हम उन सहाबा के बारे में तारीखी सबूतों की तरफ रुख करते हैं जो कर्बला में उमर इब्न साद की फौज में मौजूद थे। निम्नलिखित व्यक्तियों का मुख़ालिफ फौज में मौजूद होना दर्ज है:

1. अब्द अल-रहमान बिन अबी सबरतुल जुफी (यज़ीद बिन मलिक अल-जुफी)

यह शख्स सहाबी थे और उनके वालिद भी। दोनों अहले कूफा में से थे। इनके बेटे का नाम खुसैमा था। (अल-इसाबा, जिल्द 4, सफ़ा 260, नंबर 5141)। रोज़े आशूरा यह सहाबी उमर इब्न साद की फौज में क़बीला मज़्हज और असद की अफवाज का जनरल था। (तारीख अल–तबरी, जिल्द 5, सफ़ा 422; अल-कामिल फी अल-तारीख, जिल्द 3, सफ़ा 168)।

2. खालिद बिन उरफुतह

यह शख्स उमर इब्न साद के लश्करों में से एक लश्कर का सरदार था कर्बला में। (अल-तबक़ात अल-कबीर, जिल्द 5, सफ़ा 273, नंबर 932; अल-इसाबा, इब्न हजर, जिल्द 2, सफ़ा 209-210, नंबर 2187)। यह बात खास तौर पर ध्यान देने योग्य है कि पैगंबर मुहम्मद ने खालिद इब्न उरफुतह को फरमाया था: “ऐ खालिद, मेरे बाद फितने, आज़माइशें और इख्तिलाफात पैदा होंगे। अगर तुम अल्लाह के उस बन्दे बन सको जो मारा जाए न कि जो मारे, तो ऐसा करो।” यह नबवी नसीहत, जो उन्हें मुसीबत के दौर में मारने वाले के बजाय मारे जाने वाला बनने की ताकीद करती है, कर्बला में पैगंबर के नवासे को क़त्ल करने वाली फौज में उनकी शरीकत के बिल्कुल उलट है।

3. अम्र बिन हज्जाज जुबैदी

यह सहाबी उस फौज के अफसर थे जिसे उमर इब्न साद ने नहरे फुरात के किनारे तैनात किया था। (अल-इसाबा, जिल्द 4, सफ़ा 510, नंबर 5823)। और इसने रोज़े आशूरा इमाम हुसैन से निहायत बदकलामी भी की थी। (तारीख अल-तबरी, जिल्द 5, सफ़ा 412; अंसाबुल अशराफ, जिल्द 3, सफ़ा 390)। तारीखी मराजे इस बात की तस्दीक करते हैं कि 7 मुहर्रम, 61 हिजरी को उमर इब्न साद ने 500 सिपाहियों का एक दस्ता अम्र बिन हज्जाज की कमान में नहरे फुरात के किनारे तैनात किया, ताकि अहले बैत को पानी से महरूम किया जा सके।

4. हिजार बिन अब्जर

यह सहाबी कर्बला में उमर इब्न साद की फौज में मौजूद था। इमाम हुसैन ने उन्हें रोज़े आशूरा अपने एक खुत्बे में संबोधित किया और उनसे यह सवाल किया था: “क्या तुमने, शबस बिन रबी, क़ैस बिन अश’अस और यज़ीद बिन हारिस के साथ मुझे खत में ये बातें नहीं लिखी थीं?” (अल-इसाबा, इब्न हजर, जिल्द 2, सफ़ा 143, नंबर 1960)। हिजार बिन अब्जर उमर बिन साद की फौज के कमांडरों में से थे और उन कुफियों में से थे जिन्होंने इमाम हुसैन को कूफा बुलाने के लिए खत लिखे थे। हालाँकि, जब उबैदुल्लाह बिन जियाद ने कूफा पर क़ब्ज़ा किया तो वह इमाम हुसैन के खिलाफ हो गए और मुस्लिम बिन अकील से लोगों को अलग होने पर मजबूर किया।

5. मसरूक बिन वाएल अल-हज़रमी

इनका क़ौल दर्ज है: “मैं उन सवारों की अगली सफ़ में था जो हुसैन की तरफ आए थे। मैंने अपने दिल में कहा कि मैं अगली ही सफ़ के सवारों में रहूँ, शायद मुझे हुसैन का सिर मिल जाए, और इस ज़रिए से उबैदुल्लाह के दरबार में क़द्र और मंज़िलत पा लूँ…” (अल-इस्तीआब, इब्न अब्द अल-बिर्र, जिल्द 4, सफ़ा 1472, नंबर 2549; तारीख अल-तबरी, जिल्द 5, सफ़ा 431)।

सच तो यह है कि कर्बला की सबसे हैरतअंगेज़ बातों में से एक यह है कि हुसैन के साथ शहीद होने वाले लोग क़बायली रिश्तों से एकजुट नहीं थे। वे अलग-अलग पृष्ठभूमियों, इलाकों और तबकों से आए थे। उन्हें एकजुट करने वाली चीज़ खून नहीं बल्कि यक़ीन था। जैसा कि टॉर्स्टन हाइलेन द कर्बला स्टोरी एंड अर्ली शी’इट आइडेंटिटी में बताते हैं, यह कहानी शुरुआती शिया इस्लाम में एक मिसाली दास्तान बन गई, जो सच्चाई और झूठ के बीच अमर जंग की नुमाइंदगी करती है। इस जंग का तसव्वुरी फ्रेमवर्क, जिसमें ‘यज़ीदियत’ ताकत को सच्चाई और ‘हुसैनियत’ सच्चाई को ताकत मानती है, मुर्तज़ा मुतह्हरी जैसे विद्वानों ने विकसित किया और डॉ. मुहम्मद ताहिर-उल-कादरी सहित मौजूदा मुफक्किरों ने इसे बयान किया है।

पहला गिरोह: जिन्होंने दिलो-जान से हुसैन का साथ दिया

पैगंबर के सहाबा में से जो हुसैन के साथ लड़े और शहीद हुए, उनमें अनस इब्न अल-हारिस अल-काहिली थे। बाद की रिवायतों के मुताबिक, उन्होंने पैगंबर को हुसैन की आने वाली शहादत के बारे में बात करते सुना था। जब वह वक़्त आया, तो अनस खामोश खड़े नहीं रहे। बुढ़ापे के बावजूद, उन्होंने हुसैन का साथ दिया और शहादत क़बूल की। उनके फैसले ने पैगंबर की पीढ़ी और उनके नवासे द्वारा उठाए गए कदम के बीच तारीखी रिश्ते को ज़ाहिर किया।

अब्द अल-रहमान इब्न अब्द रब्ब अल-अंसारी एक और सहाबी थे जिन्होंने गदीर खुम का वाकया देखा था और अली की जानशीन पदवी के बारे में हदीस रिवायत की थी। उन्होंने मक्का से हुसैन का साथ दिया और कर्बला में शहीद हुए, जिससे साबित होता है कि पैगंबर के अहल-ए-बैत के प्रति उनकी वफादारी सिर्फ ज़बानी नहीं थी बल्कि उन्होंने इस पर अपनी जान दे दी।

सईद इब्न अब्दुल्लाह अल-हनफी ने कूफा के लोगों की तरफ से हुसैन को कई अहम खत पहुँचाए। आशूरा की शाम को, उन्होंने एलान कर दिया कि वह हुसैन को कभी नहीं छोड़ेंगे। जंग के दिन, उन्होंने हुसैन को नमाज़ पढ़ते वक़्त अपने बदन से बचाया और शहीद होने से पहले बहुत से तीर अपनी छाती पर खाए। उनकी कुर्बानी वफादारी की सबसे बड़ी मिसाल है।

हबीब इब्न मुज़ाहिर अल-असदी 70 साल के सहाबी थे जो पैगंबर और इमाम अली के करीबी थे। वे अपनी पक्की वफादारी के लिए मशहूर थे और कर्बला में शहीद होने वालों में पहले थे। उनकी उम्र ने उन्हें अपना नैतिक फर्ज़ निभाने से नहीं रोका।

बेशक, हुसैन के ज़्यादातर हिमायती सहाबा के बाद की पीढ़ी से ताल्लुक रखते थे। उनमें मुस्लिम इब्न औसाजा, बुरैर इब्न खुदैर, नाफी इब्न हिलाल, और ज़ुहैर इब्न अल-क़ैन शामिल थे। इन लोगों को पूरा यक़ीन था कि हुसैन का छोटा गिरोह जंग जीत नहीं सकता। फिर भी उन्होंने उनका साथ देने का फैसला किया। उनकी वफादारी फायदे के हिसाब पर नहीं बल्कि इस यक़ीन पर थी कि कुछ उसूलों की हिफाज़त हर हाल में की जानी चाहिए।

ज़ुहैर इब्न अल-क़ैन की दास्तान खास तौर पर दिलचस्प है। शुरू में जंग में शामिल होने से गुरेज़ करते हुए, उन्होंने इराक के सफर के दौरान हुसैन से मुलाकात की। तारीखी रिवायतें बताती हैं कि ज़ुहैर का काफिला इमाम से बचना चाहता था, लेकिन हालात ने उन्हें उसी जगह रुकने पर मजबूर कर दिया। जब हुसैन के क़ासिद ने उन्हें बुलाया, तो ज़ुहैर के साथी इतने परेशान हुए कि उन्होंने खाना नीचे रख दिया। यह उनकी बीवी, लेडी दुल्हम थीं, जिन्होंने उन्हें याद दिलाया: “अल्लाह के पैगंबर के बेटे ने तुम्हारे पास किसी को भेजा है और तुम्हें बुलाया है; क्या तुम उनके पास जाने को राज़ी नहीं हो?” इमाम के साथ निजी मुलाकात के बाद, ज़ुहैर पूरी तरह बदल गए। उन्होंने अपनी बीवी को तलाक़ दे दिया ताकि वह उनकी शहादत के बाद दोबारा शादी कर सके। जो शख्स जंग से बचना चाहता था, वह हुसैन का सबसे बड़ा हिमायती बन गया, हुसैन पर आने वाले तीरों को अपने सीने पर रोकता हुआ मुस्कुराता रहा और आखिरकार जंग के मैदान में जमीन पर गिर पड़ा। उनकी ज़िंदगी बताती है कि आखिरी पल में भी ज़मीर जाग सकता है, और सच्ची पकड़ अक्सर अपनी प्राथमिकताओं को पूरी तरह बदलने की माँग करती है।

बुरैर इब्न खुदैर अल-हमदानी इमाम अली के बहुत बूढ़े और परहेज़गार सहाबी थे जो अपनी गहरी इबादत के लिए मशहूर थे। उन्होंने हुसैन से शहीद होने की इजाज़त माँगी, वह क़यामत के दिन पैगंबर से मिलने के लिए बेताब थे। कुर्बानी के लिए उनका यह जोश बताता है कि ये लोग शहादत को दर्दनाक वाकया नहीं बल्कि सबसे बड़ी इज़्ज़त समझते थे।

हुसैन के लश्कर में जॉन भी शामिल थे, जो अबू धर्र अल-गिफ़ारी के आज़ाद किए गए नौकर थे। बुजुर्ग, अफ्रीकी मूल के, और पीछे हटने के लिए हर बहाना रखने वाले, उन्होंने फिर भी इमाम के साथ लड़ने पर जोर दिया। उनकी मौजूदगी ने हुसैन के क़ौस की वैश्विक हैसियत की गवाही दी। कर्बला ने अरबों और गैर-अरबों, रईसों और आज़ाद किए गए ग़ुलामों, उलेमा और जांबाजों को एक साथ इकट्ठा किया, सब इंसाफ की एक ही मुहिम पर जुटे हुए थे।

कर्बला की सबसे हैरतअंगेज़ कहानियों में से एक हुर्र इब्न यज़ीद अल-रियाही की है। ज़ुहैर के उलट, हुर्र पहले से ही दुश्मन की फौज में था। उसने हुसैन से नफरत की वजह से नहीं बल्कि अपने आला अफसरों के हुक्म की तामील के लिए यज़ीद की फौज में शामिल हो गया था। फिर भी आशूरा की रात को, हुर्र बेचैन था। वह हुसैन के कैंप में बच्चों को प्यास से चिल्लाते सुन सकता था। उसके ज़मीर ने उसे आवाज़ दी: “तूने क्या किया हुर्र? तूने फातिमा के बेटे को इस हालत में क्यों डाला? क्या अल्लाह कभी माफ़ करेगा?” यह पेशेवर फौजी सारी रात सो नहीं सका। उसके अंदर एक सिपाही की ज़िम्मेदारी और उसके इस्लामी ज़मीर के बीच जंग थी। जब आखिरकार उसने हुसैन के कैंप में जाकर पनाह माँगी, तो इमाम ने उसे तुरंत माफ़ कर दिया और कहा कि उनके दादा, पैगंबर ने भी उसे माफ़ किया है। हुर्र ताकतवरों, अमीरों और बहुतों की तरफ से कुछ भूखे-प्यासे लोगों की तरफ आया था जो जलती हुई रेत में ज़रूर मर जाएँगे। वह जंग का पहला शहीद बना, उसने आखिरी पल में अपना फैसला किया। उसका यह बदलाव बताता है कि इंसान किसी भी वक़्त अपनी राह चुनने की आज़ादी रखता है, और जो उसे चाहता है उसके लिए अल्लाह की रहमत कभी दूर नहीं है।

इसकी और मिसाल साद इब्न अल-हारिथ अल-अंसारी से मिलती है, जो पहले खारिजी आंदोलन का हिस्सा थे जिसने अली का विरोध किया था, मगर हुसैन के परिवार की फरियाद सुनकर उन्होंने अपनी वफादारी बदल दी और इमाम के साथ लड़े यहाँ तक कि वह भी शहीद हो गए। ऐसी कहानियाँ इस बात को पुख्ता करती हैं कि सच्चाई की पुकार पुरानी सियासी या फिरक़ापरस्ताना वफादारियों से परे है।

दूसरा गिरोह: जो “तटस्थ” रहे

अगर कर्बला उन लोगों को मान-सम्मान देता है जो हुसैन के साथ खड़े हुए, तो यह हमें उन लोगों के बारे में भी सोचने पर मजबूर करता है जिन्होंने ऐसा नहीं किया। इस दूसरे गिरोह में वे सहाबा शामिल थे जिन्होंने पैगंबर के खानदान से हमदर्दी तो जताई मगर आखिरकार खामोशी और अलग-थलग रहने को तरजीह दी। वे अक्सर खूनी जंग (फितना) के डर या चुप रहने को ही धार्मिक तौर पर सुरक्षित रास्ता समझने की सोच की वजह से ऐसा करते थे।

जीवित सहाबा में जाबिर इब्न अब्दुल्लाह अल-अंसारी थे। 61 हिजरी तक वह अंधे और बहुत बूढ़े हो चुके थे। शरीकन हिस्सा लेने से काफ़िर, वह फिर भी अहल अल-बैत के लिए समर्पित रहे और कर्बला के सांग के बाद हुसैन की कब्र पर जाने वालों में पहले व्यक्ति के तौर पर याद किए जाते हैं। उनके किरदार ने हमदर्दी और अदब को ज़ाहिर किया, भले ही हालात ने उनकी शरीकत को न रोका हो।

इसी तरह, सहल इब्न साद अल-साइदी और अबू सईद अल-खुदरी ने पैगंबर के अहल-ए-बैत से मुहब्बत और उनके साथ बर्ताव पर बेचैनी जताई। फिर भी वह भी जंग से अलग रहे।

ज़ैद इब्न अरकम और अनस इब्न मालिक के मामले ज़्यादा पेचीदा हैं। दोनों बड़े-बड़े सहाबा थे। दोनों ने हसन और हुसैन की फज़ीलतों के बारे में रिवायतें पेश की थीं। फिर भी किसी ने हुसैन का साथ नहीं दिया। ज़ैद इब्न अरकम ने जब हुसैन का कटा हुआ सिर उबैदुल्लाह इब्न जियाद के सामने रखा गया तो एतराज किया। उन्होंने महसूस किया कि यह कितना बड़ा जुर्म है। फिर भी यह एहसास वाकया के बाद आया। जब हुसैन को मदद चाहिए थी, ज़ैद गैर-मौजूद थे।

अनस इब्न मालिक भी इसी तरह का एक मुश्किल केस हैं। पैगंबर के सबसे करीबी खिदमतगारों में से एक और हदीस के सबसे बड़े रावियों में से एक, वह उमय्यद दौर में ज़िंदा रहे। फिर भी उन्होंने न तो हुसैन का साथ दिया और न ही हुकूमत को खुली चुनौती दी। यह एहतियात थी, बुढ़ापा, सियासी मुंह मोड़ना या कुछ और, यह बहस का मुद्दा है। जो साफ़ है वह यह कि पैगंबर की नज़दीकी ने कर्बला के वक़्त किसी की प्रतिक्रिया अपने आप तय नहीं की।

शायद सबसे प्रभावशाली जीवित सहाबी जिसने हुसैन का साथ नहीं दिया, अब्दुल्लाह इब्न उमर थे। दूसरे खलीफा उमर इब्न अल-खत्ताब के बेटे, उन्हें मुस्लिम समाज में बड़ी हैसियत हासिल थी। फिर भी इब्न उमर का मानना था कि खूनी जंग एक ज़ालिम बादशाह से भी ज़्यादा खतरनाक है। इसलिए उन्होंने हुसैन का साथ देने से इनकार कर दिया और संयम की सलाह दी। साथ ही, उन्होंने यज़ीद के काम में भी शरीकत नहीं की। उनका रुख तटस्थता और सियासी खामोशी का था।

अब्दुल्लाह इब्न अब्बास, एक और बड़े सहाबी, ने हुसैन को कूफा जाने से रोकने की कोशिश की, उन्हें डर था कि उनके साथ धोखा होगा। उन्होंने मुस्लिम समाज में और ज़्यादा खून बहने से बचने के लिए यज़ीद की बादशाहत को क़बूल कर लिया। अब्द अल-रहमान इब्न अबी बक्र, पहले खलीफा अबू बक्र के बेटे, ने भी पिछली लड़ाइयों में हज़ारों मुसलमानों की जान लेने वाले बंटवारे से बचने के लिए यज़ीद की बादशाहत को क़बूल किया।

दूसरे सहाबा, जिनमें मुहम्मद इब्न मसलमाह और अबू बकराह शामिल हैं, ने भी ऐसा ही रवैया अपनाया। उन्होंने खूनी जंग से किनारा करना पसंद किया और नए खून-खराबे के अंजाम से डरते थे। उनके फैसले धार्मिक फर्ज़ की एक खास समझ को ज़ाहिर करते हैं, जो मुक़ाबले पर स्थिरता को तरजीह देती है।

तीसरा गिरोह: जिन्होंने उमावियों का साथ दिया

यह समझना ज़रूरी है कि बहुत कम बड़े सहाबा ने यज़ीद के लिए जंग लड़ी। कर्बला के दर्दनाक वाकये के ज़िम्मेदार बड़े लोग पैगंबर की पीढ़ी से नहीं बल्कि एक जवान सियासी ठिकाने से थे जो उमावियों के ज़माने में उभरा था। इस तीसरे गिरोह में वे लोग शामिल थे जिन्होंने हुसैन के क़त्ल में बराह-ए-रास्त हिस्सा लिया। उनमें से बहुतों ने पहले पैगंबर के खानदान से हमदर्दी जताई थी, मगर सियासी या ज़ाती फायदे के लिए उन्होंने हुकूमत का साथ दिया।

इनमें उबैदुल्लाह इब्न जियाद थे, कूफा के गवर्नर जो इस क़त्ले-आम के ब्राह्मण थे। उन्होंने फौज भेजी और पानी रोकने का हुक्म दिया। उमर इब्न साद उस यज़ीदी फौज के कमांडर थे जिसने कर्बला में हुसैन का मुक़ाबला किया। शिम्र इब्न धिल-जौशन वह बेरहम शख्स था जो हुसैन का गला काटने के लिए बदनाम है। इनके अलावा हाजिर इब्न अब्जर, क़ैस इब्न अल-अश’अथ, और शबथ इब्न रिबी भी शामिल थे। इनमें से बहुत से लोग कभी इमाम अली से जुड़े थे या पहले अहल अल-बैत से हमदर्दी रखते थे। फिर भी जब उन्हें उसूल और सत्ता के बीच चुनाव करना था, तो उन्होंने हुकूमत का साथ दिया।

उमर इब्न साद की कहानी खास तौर पर सबक सिखाने वाली है। मशहूर सहाबी साद इब्न अबी वक्कास के बेटे, वह हुसैन के मर्तबे से पूरी तरह वाकिफ़ थे। तारीखी रिपोर्टें बताती हैं कि उन्होंने इमाम के खिलाफ कमान क़बूल करने से पहले झिझक महसूस की थी। फिर भी ओहदे और सियासी तरक़्की का लालच उनकी झिझक पर भारी पड़ा। उनकी त्रासदी जहालत में नहीं बल्कि ज़मीर पर हौसला को तरजीह देने में है। वह सही रास्ता जानते थे, फिर भी उन्होंने वह चुना जो दुनियावी फायदा देता था।

इसी तरह, शिम्र इब्न धिल-जौशन ने कभी अली की फौज में जंग लड़ी थी। फिर भी वह हुसैन के सब से बड़े दुश्मनों में से एक बन गया। उसका यह बदलाव बताता है कि सच्चाई की नज़दीकी उसमें पक्के रहने की गारंटी नहीं देती। इंसान अपने फैसलों से खुद को बार-बार परिभाषित करता है।

शबथ इब्न रिबी ने उमय्यद फौज में चार हज़ार लोगों का एक दस्ता तैयार किया जिसने हुसैन को घेर लिया। मुहम्मद इब्न अल-अश’अथ उमय्यद फौज का एक और दस्ते का सरदार था और उन क़बायली सरदारों में से एक था जिन्होंने कूफा में अपने लोगों पर दबाव डाला कि वे हुसैन के चचेरे भाई मुस्लिम इब्न अकील को छोड़ दें। इन सब लोगों को इंसाफ के लिए खड़े होने का मौका मिला था, मगर उन्होंने ताकत के साथ खड़े होने का चुनाव किया।

सही रास्ते और मौक़ापरस्ती में फ़र्क

यह हमें कर्बला के सबसे गहरे सबक पर लाता है। न तो खानदान और न ही बुज़ुर्गों से नज़दीकी इंसान को नैतिक गिरावट से बचा सकती है। हुसैन और यज़ीद दोनों कुरैश के थे। दोनों इज़्ज़तदार खानदानों से थे। दोनों को इस्लाम से बदली हुई जमात की मीरास मिली। फिर भी तारीख उन्हें एक दम अलग-अलग तरह से याद करती है, उनके चुनाव की वजह से।

यही उसूल कहीं ज़्यादा वसीअ तौर पर लागू होता है। अबू लहब पैगंबर के चाचा थे, फिर भी क़ुरान में उनकी मज़म्मत की गई। सलमान अल-फारसी खून के रिश्ते से पैगंबर से कोई नाता नहीं रखते थे, फिर भी उन्होंने बड़ा मर्तबा हासिल किया। बिलाल इब्न रबाह, ग़ुलामी में पैदा हुए, उस इज़्ज़त के मालिक हैं जो बहुत से अमीर-ज़ादों को कभी नहीं मिली। कर्बला ने तारीख के ज़रिए उस उसूल की तस्दीक़ की जो वही ने पहले ही बता दिया था: इंसान की क़दर उसके खानदान से नहीं बल्कि उसके कामों से तय होती है।

जैसा कि शेख-उल-इस्लाम डॉ. मुहम्मद ताहिर-उल-कादरी ने बताया है, कर्बला का दौर असल में दो फलसफों के बीच की जंग है। एक गिरोह मानता है कि ताकत ही सच्चाई है और उसका साथ देना चाहिए। दूसरा कहता है कि सच्चाई ही ताकत है और उसे पूरी तरह क़बूल करना चाहिए। ताकत को हक़ समझना ‘यज़ीदियत’ है, जबकि सच्चाई को ताकत समझना ‘हुसैनियत’ है। यह फ़र्क कर्बला के दिल में है। यज़ीद ने ज़ुल्म, जबर, तानाशाही, बद-अमली और ताकत पर पूरा क़ब्ज़ा करने वाले निज़ाम की बुनियाद रखी। इमाम हुसैन ने इस ज़ुल्म और बेरहमी के निज़ाम के खिलाफ सच्चाई का झंडा बुलंद किया। यह जंग ताकत पाने के लिए दो शहज़ादों के बीच नहीं थी बल्कि सच्चाई और झूठ, इंसानियत और बर्बरता, इंसाफ और ज़ुल्म की ताकतों के बीच थी।

इन गिरोहों के बीच का सख़्त फ़र्क, जिन्होंने सच्चाई के लिए सब कुछ क़ुर्बान कर दिया, जो स्थिरता के लिए खामोश रहे, और जिन्होंने हौसला के लिए क़त्ल किया, कर्बला के नैतिक सबक की जड़ है। यह बताता है कि ज़मीर की असली परीक्षा किसी के खानदान या पिछले एलानों में नहीं बल्कि आखिरी फैसले में है जब उसूल और ताकत एक-दूसरे के सामने खड़े हों। तारीख पहले गिरोह को हीरो के तौर पर याद करती है, दूसरे को ख़ामोशी के ज़रिए मिलीभगत की सावधानीपूर्ण मिसाल के तौर पर, और तीसरे को इस बात की निशानी के तौर पर कि दुनियावी हौसला रूह को कैसे गंदा कर सकता है।

इस्लाम की बाद की तारीख ने इस सबक को मज़बूत किया। अब्बासियों ने उमय्यदों को उखाड़ फेंका जबकि उन्होंने पैगंबर के खानदान से अपने रिश्ते के ज़रिए जायज़ीत का दावा किया। फिर भी बहुत से अब्बासी हुक्मरानों ने अली की औलाद को सताया और उसी सख़्ती से मुख़ालिफत को कुचला। उनके किरदार ने एक बार फिर साबित कर दिया कि खून का रिश्ता अकेले कोई नैतिक क़ीमत नहीं रखता। हाशिम और उमय्या दोनों की औलाद में नेक और हौसलामंद दोनों क़िस्म के लोग पैदा हुए। तारीख उनका फैसला उनके खानदान से नहीं बल्कि उनके किरदार से करती है।

यही वजह है कि कर्बला सदियों और तहज़ीबों में गूंजता रहता है। यह सिर्फ शियाओं की याद या मुसलमानों की याद नहीं है। यह एक आम इंसानी नैतिक नाटक है। यह ऐसे सवाल पूछता है जिनका सामना हर ज़माने को करना पड़ता है। ज़ुल्म के सामने क्या करना चाहिए? क्या हमदर्दी काफी है, या सच्चाई को अमल की ज़रूरत है? क्या स्थिरता की खोज ख़ामोशी को जायज़ ठहराती है? क्या ताकत को क़बूल किया जा सकता है जब वह उसूल से समझौता करे?

हुसैन के साथ खड़े होने वालों ने क़ुर्बानी के ज़रिए इन सवालों का जवाब दिया। जो तटस्थ रहे, उन्होंने एहतियात के ज़रिए जवाब दिया। जिन्होंने उमय्यदों का साथ दिया, उन्होंने इताअत, हौसला या सियासी गणना के ज़रिए जवाब दिया। तारीख उन सब को इसी हिसाब से याद करती है।

आखिरी तहलील में, कर्बला सिर्फ इमाम हुसैन की शहादत नहीं थी। यह किरदार की पोल खोलने वाला वाकया था। इसने एक पूरी पीढ़ी की खूबियों और कमज़ोरियों को बेनक़ाब कर दिया। इसने साबित कर दिया कि समाज में असली बंटवारा क़बीलों, खानदानों या परिवारों के बीच नहीं है, बल्कि उन लोगों के बीच है जो उसूल चुनते हैं और जो ताकत चुनते हैं। इस दर्दनाक वाकये ने शुरुआती मुस्लिम समाज के लिए ज़मीर की एक गहरी परीक्षा का काम किया, और इसका नैतिक पैग़ाम सदियों से गूंजता रहता है। यह कई रूहानी रिवायतों में पाई जाने वाली एक बुनियादी हक़ीक़त की तस्दीक़ करता है: इंसान की क़दर उसके खानदान से नहीं बल्कि उसके कामों से तय होती है, बुज़ुर्गों से नज़दीकी से नहीं बल्कि उसके फैसलों की दरुस्ती से।

यही वजह है कि कर्बला आज भी ज़िंदा है। हर ज़माना अपने ज़ुल्म की नई सूरतें, अपनी हम-अहंगी के नए दबाव, ताकत और रुतबे के नए लालच पैदा करता है। जो सवाल सहाबा, ताबिऊन, उमय्यदों और हुसैन के हिमायतियों के सामने था, वह आज भी इंसानियत के सामने है। जब सच्चाई और ताकत एक-दूसरे के सामने खड़ी हों, तो हम किस तरफ खड़े होंगे? सच्चाई का साथ दुनियावी कामयाबी तो नहीं दे सकता, मगर वह अकेला नैतिक पकड़ और तारीखी तस्दीक़ प्रदान करता है। सच्चाई का साथ देना, चाहे वह सबसे आसान रास्ता न हो, एक ऐसे उसूल को ज़िंदा रखना है जो किसी भी इंसाफ़पसंद और इज़्ज़त वाले समाज की बुनियाद है। हुसैन की ज़बरदस्त अज़मत सिर्फ इस बात में नहीं है कि वह कौन थे, बल्कि इस बात में है कि उन्होंने क्या चुना। उनके बहुत से मुख़ालिफों की त्रासदी सिर्फ इस बात में नहीं है कि वह कौन थे, बल्कि इस बात में है कि उन्होंने क्या चुना। और इसी में कर्बला का हमेशा रहने वाला सबक छिपा है, एक सबक जो हमें तारीख के गवाह बनने की बजाय इंसाफ की अमर जंग में फ़ाइल बनने का बुलावा देता है।

आखिरी नोट: सहाबा को एक समान नहीं देखा जा सकता

इसके नैतिक और रूहानी पहलुओं के अलावा, 61 हिजरी की कर्बला की त्रासदी का बहुत गहरा मतलब है कि हम मुसलमानों की पहली पीढ़ी को कैसे समझें। उस दिन के वाकयात ने एक बार और हमेशा के लिए साबित कर दिया कि पैगंबर मुहम्मद के सहाबा को एक जैसे मोहतरम और सीधे-सच्चे लोगों के एक समान गिरोह के तौर पर नहीं देखा जा सकता। हुसैन के रुख के सामने जो जवाब आए, उनमें उनके साथ शहीद होना भी था, बे-हिसी से तटस्थ रहना भी था, और उनके क़त्ल में बराह-ए-रास्त शामिल होना भी था, यह अलग-अलग जवाब उस सोच को खारिज कर देते हैं कि सब सहाबा एक जैसे नेक, मासूम या ऐब से पाक थे।

यह नतीजा किसी फिरक़ापरस्ताना ज़द-ओ-कोच का नहीं बल्कि तारीख की साफ़ गवाही का है। जिन क्लासिकी किताबों ने सहाबा के नाम और काम संभाल कर रखे हैं, वे एक ऐसी जमात पेश करती हैं जो हर इंसानी जमात की तरह, नैतिक हिम्मत, सियासी हौसला, ज़ाती यक़ीन और रूहानी समझ की अलग-अलग दरजों वाले लोगों से बनी थी। यह कि कुछ सहाबा हुसैन का साथ देते हुए मारे गए, जबकि दूसरे खामोश खड़े रहे, और फिर भी दूसरे या उनके बेटों ने उनकी शहादत में सक्रिय हिस्सा लिया, यह साबित करता है कि ‘सहाबी’ होना कभी भी नैतिक या रूहानी मासूमियत की गारंटी नहीं था।

क़ुरान खुद इस हक़ीक़त से वाकिफ़ कराता है। यह बार-बार उन लोगों में फ़र्क करता है जो ईमान लाते हैं और नेक काम करते हैं और जो गुमराही में पड़ जाते हैं, चाहे उनका बाहरी ताल्लुक या पैगंबर से नज़दीकी कैसी भी हो। पैगंबर मुहम्मद ने खुद चेतावनी दी थी कि उनके साथ रहने वाले सब नहीं बचेंगे, यह बताते हुए कि कुछ को क़यामत के दिन कौसर के हौज़ से धकेल दिया जाएगा, और उनसे कहा जाएगा: “तुम्हें नहीं मालूम कि उन्होंने तुम्हारे बाद क्या नई बातें ईजाद कीं।” यह नबवी चेतावनी, सहीह अल-बुखारी और सहीह मुस्लिम जैसी मानी हुई हदीसों में मौजूद है, यह उसूल कायम करती है कि पैगंबर की सोहबत, जितनी बड़ी इज़्ज़त है, गलती से पाक होने की ज़मानत नहीं देती और न ही नजात की गारंटी देती है।

कर्बला इस ख़याली उसूल को तारीख की सख़्त हक़ीक़त में बदल देता है। अनस इब्न अल-हारिस, जो हुसैन के लिए शहीद हुए, और उमर इब्न साद, जिन्होंने हुसैन के खिलाफ फौज की कमान संभाली, के बीच जो फ़र्क है, वह इससे ज़्यादा बड़ा नहीं हो सकता। दोनों सहाबा या सहाबा की औलाद थे। दोनों को एक ही नबवी मीरास मिली। फिर भी उनका चुनाव एक दम अलग था। इसी तरह, अब्दुल्लाह इब्न उमर की बे-हिसी, चाहे वह फितना के डर से कितनी भी सच्ची क्यों न हो, हबीब इब्न मुज़ाहिर के जान-निसारी के सामने साफ़ नज़र आती है। ये मामूली लोग नहीं बल्कि अपने ज़माने के बहुत बड़े लोग हैं।

सुनहरी उसूल जो पहले बयान किया गया, उसे कर्बला के वाकयात में अपनी पूरी तस्दीक़ मिलती है। सिर्फ वही सहाबा इज़्ज़त और मुहब्बत के लायक हैं जो सकलैन (क़ुरान और इत्रत अहलुलबैत) से जुड़े रहे, उनकी पैरवी करते रहे और मवद्दत फिल क़ुर्बा की राह पर रहे। तारीखी रिकॉर्ड बताता है कि सभी सहाबा इस कसौटी पर खरे नहीं उतरे। कुछ, जैसे अनस इब्न अल-हारिस और हबीब इब्न मुज़ाहिर, ने पैगंबर के खानदान की हिफाज़त में अपनी जानें दे दीं। दूसरे, जैसे अब्दुल्लाह इब्न उमर, ने सियासी खामोशी को चुना। और कुछ, जैसा कि हमने देखा, शारीरिक तौर पर उस फौज में मौजूद थे जिसने पैगंबर के नवासे का क़त्ल किया, और इस्लामी तारीख की सबसे बड़ी त्रासदी में सक्रिय रूप से शामिल रहे।

इस तारीखी हकीकत के बहुत बड़े मज़हबी और तारीखी मायने हैं। यह माँग करती है कि हम सहाबा का मुताला बारीकी, फ़िक्री तज्ज़िया और नैतिक सूझ-बूझ के साथ करें, न कि उस अंधी ताज़ीम के साथ जो सब फ़र्क मिटा देती है। यह हमें लोगों का मूल्यांकन उनके कामों और फैसलों के आधार पर करने पर मजबूर करती है, न कि सिर्फ उनके ओहदे या पैगंबर से नज़दीकी के आधार पर। यह हमें याद दिलाती है कि नैतिक इख्तियार सोहबत से नहीं बल्कि सहीह अमल से हासिल होता है। यह उस उसूल की फिर से तस्दीक़ करती है कि पैगंबर के खानदान से मुहब्बत (मवद्दत फिल क़ुर्बा) सिर्फ जज़्बात का मामला नहीं बल्कि ज़मीर की परीक्षा है जो ठोस वफादारी और कुर्बानी का तक़ाज़ा करती है।

इस तरह कर्बला की त्रासदी अंधी ताज़ीम की हर किस्म के लिए ज़ोरदार ललकार है। यह मुसलमानों और तारीखदानों को एक जैसा बुलावा देती है कि वह पहचानें कि पहली इस्लामी जमात नेकी और बदी, हिम्मत और बज़दिली, उसूल और मौक़ापरस्ती का एक पेचीदा जाल थी। यह हमें लोगों का फैसला उनके लेबल से नहीं बल्कि उनके कामों से, उनके दावों से नहीं बल्कि उनकी क़ुर्बानियों से करने का सबक देती है। यह क़ुरान के फरमान के मुताबिक है: “और जिसने ज़र्रे के बराबर नेकी की होगी वह उसे देख लेगा, और जिसने ज़र्रे के बराबर बदी की होगी वह उसे देख लेगा” (क़ुरान 99:7-8)।

आखिरकार, कर्बला हमें सिखाता है कि सच्चाई तादाद, रुतबा या खानदान से तय नहीं होती, बल्कि ज़मीर की दरुस्ती और यक़ीन की हिम्मत से तय होती है। यह हमें याद दिलाता है कि तारीख हमारा फैसला इस आधार पर नहीं करती कि हम किसके साथ हैं बल्कि इस आधार पर करती है कि हम क्या चुनते हैं। और यह हमें यह क़बूल करने पर मजबूर करती है कि पैगंबर के सब से करीबी लोगों में भी, कुछ ऐसे थे जो इज़्ज़त की बुलंदियों पर पहुँचे और कुछ ऐसे थे जो नैतिक गिरावट की गहराइयों में गिरे। यह कर्बला का सख़्त सबक है, और यह एक ऐसा सबक है जिसे तारीख का कोई भी ईमानदार तालिब-ए-इल्म नज़रअंदाज़ नहीं कर सकता।

—————————————————————

मराजे और हवाले

यह मज़मून क्लासिकी तारीखी मराजे और जदीद तहकीक़ के गहुर मुताला पर मबनी है।

बुनियादी तारीखी मराजे:

· अल-तबरी, तारीख अल-रुसुल वा अल-मुलुक (पैगंबरों और बादशाहों की तारीख)
· इब्न अल-असीर, अल-कामिल फी अल-तारीख (मुकम्मल तारीख)
· इब्न कसीर, किताब अल-बिदाया वा अल-निहाया (शुरू और आखिर)
· अल-बलाधुरी, अंसाब अल-अशरफ (शरीफ़ों के खानदान)
· इब्न अब्द अल-बिर्र, अल-इस्तीआब फी मारिफ़त अल-अशाब (सहाबा की पहचान में मुकम्मल जानकारी)
· इब्न हजर अल-असकलानी, अल-इसाबा फी तम्यीज़ अल-सहाबा (सहाबा की पहचान में सही जानकारी)
· इब्न साद, अल-तबक़ात अल-कबीर (बड़े तबक़ात)

जदीद तहकीक:

· हैगलर, आरोन एम. द इकोज़ ऑफ़ फितना: डिवेलपिंग हिस्टोरियोग्राफिकल इंटरप्रिटेशन्स ऑफ़ द बैटल ऑफ़ कर्बला। यह किताब बताती है कि कर्बला के मतलब को नए सिरे से समझाने की चाहत मुअर्रिखों की तहरीर के बीच में कैसे है।
· हाइलेन, टॉर्स्टन. द कर्बला स्टोरी एंड अर्ली शी’इट आइडेंटिटी। यह बताती है कि यह दास्तान शुरूआती शिया इस्लाम में एक मिसाली कहानी कैसे बन गई।
· मुतह्हरी, मुर्तज़ा. द मार्टिरडम ऑफ़ इमाम हुसैन एंड द लेसन्स ऑफ़ कर्बला। यह ‘यज़ीदियत’ और ‘हुसैनियत’ के टकराव को समझने के लिए तसव्वुरी फ्रेमवर्क मुहैया कराता है।
· ताहिर-उल-कादरी, डॉ. मुहम्मद. द फिलॉसफी ऑफ़ कर्बला। यह ताकत को सच्चाई और सच्चाई को ताकत के दरमियान फ़र्क साफ़ करता है।
· जाफरी, एस.एच.एम. द ओरिजिंस एंड अर्ली डिवेलपमेंट ऑफ़ शी’आ इस्लाम। यह शुरूआती इस्लामी समाज की सियासी और मज़हबी दरारों को समझने के लिए ज़रूरी तारीखी पृष्ठभूमि देता है।
· मैडेलुंग, विलफर्ड. द सक्सेशन टू मुहम्मद: ए स्टडी ऑफ़ द अर्ली कैलिफ़ेट। यह कर्बला के वाकयात तक ले जाने वाली सियासी गतिशीलता का पूरा तज्ज़िया पेश करता है।

मकामी और सवानिही मराजे:

· एनसाइक्लोपीडिया ब्रिटानिका में कर्बला की जंग, यज़ीद प्रथम, उबैदुल्लाह इब्न जियाद, और उमर इब्न साद के बारे में मुख्तसर जानकारी बड़े किरदारों और सियासी हालात का मुख़्तसर जायज़ा देती है।
· बड़े किरदारों के सवानिह, जिनमें हुसैन के हिमायती और मुख़ालिफ़ सहाबा शामिल हैं, क्लासिकी तारीखी किताबों और जदीद तहकीकों दोनों के मुफ़स्सिल ब्यान से लिए गए हैं, जिनमें इब्न साद और इब्न हजर अल-असकलानी की सवानिही किताबें भी शामिल हैं।

हदीस के मराजे:

· हसन और हुसैन की फज़ीलतों के बारे में जो रिवायतें सहाबा ने बयान कीं, जैसे ज़ैद इब्न अरकम और अनस इब्न मालिक, वे सुन्नी और शिया हदीस की मानी हुई किताबों से ली गई हैं, जिनमें सहीह अल-बुखारी, सहीह मुस्लिम, और अल-तिर्मिधि तथा इब्न माजाह के संग्रह शामिल हैं।
· कौसर के हौज़ के मामले में पैगंबर की चेतावनी सहीह अल-बुखारी और सहीह मुस्लिम में दर्ज है।खालिद इब्न उरफुतह की हदीस मुस्नद अहमद में दर्ज है।